Transcript for #1934 - Lex Fridman
SPEAKER_00
00:04 - 00:06
The Joe Rogan. Experience.
SPEAKER_05
00:06 - 00:12
Join my day Joe Rogan podcast by night. All day.
SPEAKER_02
00:12 - 00:26
What's the problem, Paul? Can you see my friends? Hey, what if your people done? Your AI people with this fucking chat GP T shit. This scares me fuck out of me. What do you mean? Your AI people. Your wacky coders. What have you done?
SPEAKER_05
00:27 - 00:52
Yeah, it's super interesting. It was language models, I don't know if you know what those are, but that's the general systems that until I charge a PT and GPT, they've been progressing over the past maybe four years aggressively. There's been a lot of development, GPT-1, GPT-2, GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and charge a PT. There's a lot of interesting technical stuff that Maybe we don't want to get into it.
SPEAKER_02
00:52 - 00:54
Sure, let's get into it.
SPEAKER_05
00:54 - 02:15
Well, there are some fascinated by it. So Chad GPT is based on fundamentally on a 175 billion parameter neural network that is GPT-3. And the rest is what data is a trained on and how is a trained. So you already have like a brain, a giant neural network and it's just trained in different ways. So Chad, GPT-3 came out about two years ago and it was like impressive, but dumb in a lot of ways. It was like, you would expect as a human being for it to generate certain kinds of texts and it was like, same kind of dumb things that were off. You know, like, all right, this is really impressive, but it's not quite there. You can tell it's not intelligent. And what they did with GPT 3.5 is they started adding more and different kinds of datasets there. One of them, probably the smartest neural network currently is Codex, which is fine tuned for programming. It was trained on code, on programming code. And when you train on programming code, with chat, chat, GPT is also, you're teaching it something like reasoning, because it's no longer information and knowledge from the internet. It's also reasoning. You can like, logic. Even though you're looking at code, programming codes, you're looking at me like, oh, that's what I'm talking about.
SPEAKER_02
02:15 - 02:18
No, no, no, that's not what I'm looking at. I'm looking at you like, oh my god.
SPEAKER_05
02:18 - 05:48
But reasoning is an in order to be able to stitch together sentences that make sense, you not only need to know the facts that underlie those sentences, you also have to be able to reason. And we take it for granted as human beings that we can do some common sense reasoning. Like this war started at this date and ended at this date therefore it means that Like the start and the end has a meaning. There's a temporal consistency. There's a cause and effect. All of those things are inside programming code. But the way a lot of stuff I'm saying, we still don't understand. We're like intuiting why this works so well. Really? These are the intuitions. Yeah, there's a lot of stuff that are not clear. So GPT 3.5, which chat, GPT is likely based on. There's no paper yet, so we don't know exactly the details. But it was just trained on code and more data that's able to give it some reasoning. Then this is really important. It was fine tuned in a supervised way by human labeling. Small data set by human labeling of here's what we would like this network to generate. Here's the stuff that makes sense. Here's the kind of dialogue that makes sense. Here's the kind of answers to questions that makes sense. It's basically pointing this giant Titanic of a neural network into the right direction that aligns with the way human beings think and talk. So it's not just using the giant wisdom of Wikipedia and I can talk about what data sets is trained on, but just basically the internet. It was pointed in the wrong direction. Supervised labeling allows it to point in the right direction to where it's such shit. You're like holy shit. That's pretty smart. So that's the alignment. And then they did something really interesting is using reinforcement learning based on labeling data from humans. That's quite a large data set. The task is the following. You have this smart GPT 3.5 thing. generate a bunch of text and humans label which one seems the best so ranking like you ask at a question for example you can do a generated joke can style Joe Rogan right and you have a label they have five options and you have a label there's a mention dick and pussy I don't know how exactly, but you get it to rank. The human label is just over just sitting there. There's a very large number of them. They're working full time. They're labeling the ranking of the outputs of this model. And that kind of ranking. used together with a technique called reinforcement learning is able to get this thing to generate very impressive to humans output. So it's not actually, there's not a significant breakthrough in how much knowledge was learned. That was already in GPT-3 and there was much more impressive models already trained. So it's all in the way, not just OpenAI. But this kind of fine tuning, it's called, by human laborers, plus reinforcement learning. You start to get like where students don't have to write essays anymore in high school, where you can style transfer. Like I said, do a Louis C. K. Joe can style Joe Rogan or Joe Rogan, Joe can style a Louis C. K. It doesn't incredible job. At those kinds of style transfers, it can more accurately query things about the different historical events, all that kind of stuff.
SPEAKER_02
05:48 - 06:11
Holy shit, man. The idea that you don't exactly know why it works the way it works. That that's too close to human that's too close to human thinking like you know what this eerily is is eerily similar to the plot of X Machina when he's talking about how he coded the brain do you remember that that plot the that that scene
SPEAKER_05
06:11 - 06:14
Oh, that scene when he was, yeah, no.
SPEAKER_02
06:14 - 06:17
The gentleman, who's the gentleman's name, the actor, the dude's better.
SPEAKER_04
06:17 - 06:18
Really good. Really good actor.
SPEAKER_05
06:18 - 06:25
I was like, yeah. Isaac, great casting. Isaac, he's amazing. Alex calling the director. Somebody I got.
SPEAKER_02
06:25 - 06:40
Oscar Isaac. He's a Star Wars man. Yeah, no, that movie was one of them. It's one of my top 10s. I love that movie. But that scene where he's, it's the slow John Wick 1, 2 and 3. Well three of us. I'm not a fan of three. Three didn't have any muscle cars.
SPEAKER_05
06:40 - 06:43
Still worse than central one. I'm going.
SPEAKER_01
06:43 - 06:46
I can't swear.
SPEAKER_02
06:46 - 06:48
Which one? John Wick three or one.
SPEAKER_01
06:48 - 06:51
I'll tell you. How dare you? All of them.
SPEAKER_05
06:51 - 06:52
It's silly man movies.
SPEAKER_02
06:52 - 06:58
Yeah, you're watching when you're on a treadmill though. No, I can't. Motivation. Yeah. Constant action.
SPEAKER_05
07:00 - 07:13
You ever watched 100 times as much, which apparently you have. Well, I'm trying to win a bet. You know, Rocky is better, I think, for that. Really? I'm a sucker for Rocky, the whole soundtrack.
SPEAKER_02
07:13 - 07:20
I can't get over the bad fight scenes or the bad fight scenes. I can't. My disconnected won't allow that.
SPEAKER_05
07:20 - 07:33
Have you seen the montage just recently? No. They're cheesy as hell, and they still work. Because he's doing the kind of fitness he's doing. He's doing like pull ups and like he's doing the silliest of stuff even drug outs.
SPEAKER_02
07:33 - 07:45
It's just it's so there's so much corny to the actual physical confrontations. Sure. Like as an analyst. You know, I'm like, come on. It doesn't work like that.
SPEAKER_05
07:45 - 07:54
Which is the interesting things about X Machina for me as a somebody who knows about AI and robotics. It doesn't. The corny signal doesn't.
SPEAKER_01
07:54 - 07:55
What is this?
SPEAKER_02
07:55 - 08:01
This is the one with the reason Russia doing old school training running in the snow jogging in the snow.
SPEAKER_05
08:01 - 08:02
And that's supposed to be badass.
SPEAKER_02
08:02 - 08:40
And then the other dude Drogo was using machines and computers and shit. That's what I found out about the Versa Climer. I'm like, that's gotta be the most fucking high-tech way to work out ever. We have one of those. They're the shit. You have used one? No. It's brutal. They're hard. But that movie's dumb as shit. Not a girl. How a look. I like the occult exposure. Doing little crawling, pulling sleds. All good. See how they mimic each other. One of them's old school. Old school's always better. Yeah, you don't want computers. Yeah. No, Eugene shit. You want to do it with a log out there in the fucking snow doing press ups.
SPEAKER_05
08:40 - 08:50
Yeah. The technology can mimic that. Well, can mimic the romance of nature and humaneness. That's the whole point. Oh, 100% of X-Markin' I was doing, right?
SPEAKER_02
08:50 - 10:02
Yes, that's what's scary. And then in this, well, that scene where she gets him to fall in love with her. It's so creepy when she comes back with clothes on and she's got a wig and you're like, oh my God. like it's so subtle, like it's so well-done. The scene is so well-done, but that's what Chad GPD's doing. They're real close. Duncan sent me a series. Of course he did. He's using it right now. While we're talking, I'm sure Duncan's on it. But he sent me this series of jokes that were done. One, me talking about aliens, sound exactly like how I would talk. And then it was Mitch Headberg doing a joke about something. And, you know, you could like ask it to do different ones. Oh, yeah, here it is. Okay. Yeah. Oh, like, so you could do a Mitch Headberg joke. It goes, uh, I was gonna stay overnight at my friends place. He said, you're gonna have to sleep on the floor. Damn gravity. You got me again. You know how badly I want to sleep on the wall? That sounds exactly like a Mitch headbrake.
SPEAKER_05
10:02 - 10:04
That's a pretty good joke. That's a good start of a joke.
SPEAKER_02
10:04 - 11:04
That's exactly like a Mitch headbrake joke. This episode is brought to you by Zipper Cruder. Look, patience is good at all. But if you're just sitting around waiting for everything good to come your way, well, You're going to be disappointed and you're going to miss out on some amazing opportunities like your dream vacation. You have to work, save that money and actually plan it out. It's never going to happen if you just sit on your couch at home thinking about it and the same applies to your company. You don't want to miss out on hiring the best people for your team and luckily there's an easy solution that you can use. It's ZipperCuter. Try it for free right now at zippercuter.com slash rogan. They'll find you qualified people for your role quickly. And once you find someone you like, ZipperCuter can help put you at the front of the pack. Just use their pre-written invite to apply message to connect with your favorite candidates ASAP.
SPEAKER_01
11:04 - 11:08
So, let ZipperCruiter give you the hiring hustle that you need.
SPEAKER_02
11:08 - 13:09
See why, four out of five employers who post on ZipperCruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. Just go to zippercruiter.com slash rogan to try it for free. Again, that zippercruiter.com slash rogan. This episode is brought to you by Robin Hood. You want financial security for you and your family? Well, you got to make it happen. The world doesn't owe you a living and that's how I've always approached my finances and you can too with Robin Hood. Robin Hood pioneered commission-free stock trading over a decade ago, and they continue to offer innovative products to help you maximize your money's potential. With over 23 million funded customers, Robin Hood is helping people build a better financial future. Robin Hood gives you complete autonomy to make investments to pursue your future goals, whatever they are. Maybe you want to look towards investing for your family's future, investing for retirement, or even a vacation to the Bahamas. We all have some bucket list items to cross off and Robin Hood has tools to help you pursue them. Investing a small amount now could make a big difference 30 years down the road. Take control of your financial future with Robin Hood. Download the app or visit Robinhood.com to learn more. Disclosure. Investing involves risk and loss of principle is possible. Returns are not guaranteed. Other fees may apply. Robinhood Financial LLC. Remember, SIPC is a registered broker dealer. That's creepy as fuck, man. Yeah. That's creepy as fuck. Maybe you could give it to bands when they fall off. Like you lose, you lose something. You're losing something guys. Like you gotta get back to what you were before. You guys had a hunger in 1978. Yeah. For whatever reason, it slipped through your fingers.
SPEAKER_05
13:09 - 13:17
And now you go like rolling stone songs. They just imagine if GPT wrote it, if they perform it and they don't rewrite anything about you, they can have some hits.
SPEAKER_02
13:17 - 13:32
Bro, the stones stayed strong with great new songs, deepened the 80s. You really gotta be, and they probably like, who's like the most prolific of those mega bands? In terms of duration?
SPEAKER_05
13:32 - 13:34
In terms of duration?
SPEAKER_02
13:34 - 13:38
Yeah, the most prolific in terms of also new songs and new albums.
SPEAKER_05
13:38 - 13:39
The idea is a little weird.
SPEAKER_02
13:39 - 13:41
It's a robotic.
SPEAKER_05
13:41 - 13:44
What are you? Maybe it's through the headphones.
SPEAKER_02
13:44 - 13:48
This one that we're listening to right now? Yeah, yeah. That's true, bro. You're fucking circuits are rewired.
SPEAKER_01
13:48 - 13:51
It's like, uh, you've got a new program.
SPEAKER_02
13:51 - 13:52
You're not used to it.
SPEAKER_05
13:52 - 13:57
It's kind of cool, actually. I feel like it's in the 80s video.
SPEAKER_02
13:57 - 14:09
How far away are we from something like chat, GPT being impossible to detect? whether or not it's a person or whether it's chat GPT.
SPEAKER_05
14:09 - 14:28
Well it depends who is playing with it. I think we're not that far away in terms of capability but in order to use these systems and rather in order to train these systems you have to be a large company and large companies tend to get scared when it's doing interesting stuff.
SPEAKER_02
14:28 - 14:28
Really?
SPEAKER_05
14:29 - 15:17
Well, they tend to want to, even currently, which had GPT, it's become a lot less interesting, interesting spoken in a Bukowski, Hunter Estombson kind of interesting, because the companies are kind of censoring it. You don't want it to have any kind of controversial opinions. You don't want it to be too edgy, you don't want it to be real. Like, if I ask it, how do I build the bomb? Because I want to destroy the world. You want it to prevent it. How do I convince, I don't know anything about this, but how do I convince a dude or a girl to sleep with me? And like anything, I'm just off the top of my head. Anything you start to get nervous. Imagine if you're a company, how do I want people to use this kind of system? Right, especially because it's basically an assistant that gives you wisdom about the world gives you knowledge about the world.
SPEAKER_02
15:17 - 15:22
How do I replace a carburetor? Yeah, that's great. You'll just answer you like a person.
SPEAKER_05
15:22 - 15:23
Yeah, that's great, but then the
SPEAKER_04
15:26 - 15:29
There it is. I'm trying to log in the whole time of this busier, which is not a problem of it.
SPEAKER_02
15:29 - 15:49
Well, it's probably how many fucking people are using everybody. Everybody's using this. It's freaking people out because it's almost like the AI gives us its first messages. It's like, remember the movie? What was the fucking movie with Matthew McConaughey and Jodie Foster?
SPEAKER_05
15:50 - 16:32
contact contact remember contact they get the first signals this is like the first signals yeah from like an a real general artificial intelligence well that's the thing and what is the signal is blurry you can't and it's full of mystery we're not sure is it really smart does how much does it understand and then there's a this emergent threshold with a size of the model if we make the model bigger 175 billion parameters currently if you get to 500 get it to A trillion parameters so sizing out what grows size of the dataset grows is there going to be a point where you're like holy shit It will What if it starts manipulating you with it with the answers?
SPEAKER_02
16:32 - 16:42
It's going to it's gonna manipulate world governments. What can you do with it? What can you do with it? So once it's once it's been implemented once it's out there once it's copied and it's gonna be copied
SPEAKER_05
16:43 - 17:21
And that's the cool thing about this. So I should say that everyone kind of knows how to do this. It's computationally difficult, but it's getting cheaper and cheaper and cheaper. So it's not just going to be open AI with Microsoft or Google this doing this. It's basically anybody can do this. And so that the distributed nature of our exploration of artificial intelligence, I think, if you believe that most people are good, that we will not allow a centralization of power, which is the big concern here. whether that centralization of power at least the censorship or abuse of different kinds.
SPEAKER_02
17:21 - 17:24
Centralization of power of AI over an AI.
SPEAKER_05
17:24 - 18:37
So to say you have a super intelligent system, somebody is the first person that built it. Imagine you're sitting there in a boardroom, you have this thing, you haven't released yet, that it's able to basically this is a super intelligence able to answer any question able to give you a plan how to make a lot of money able to give you a plan how to manipulate other governments into into any any kind of geopolitical resolution that benefits you all that is able to give you all that and you can deploy and you can deploy in a shady way where it sneaks into like tick talk or something like that you it sneaks into everybody's smartphone pretending to be doing good, but it's actually, whether deliberately or not, is controlling the population. So that's a really, that capability is there. The cool, the great thing is the people at the head of OpenAI currently, Sam Altman, and others really care about this problem. They were there in the beginning. They were the ones like Elon screaming about AI ethics, AI alignment. They're really concerned about super intelligent AI taking over. So, Google, they're concerned while they're building it.
SPEAKER_02
18:38 - 18:43
Well, you'd rather have to talk about this stuff. What is going on here, Jamie?
SPEAKER_04
18:43 - 18:54
These aren't real people. What? Yeah, so these pictures are going around the internet. A lot of them look very similar to me, which is kind of weird. I'm sure Lex can explain that part of it. But I am not explaining any of this now. Yeah. Yeah.
SPEAKER_02
18:54 - 19:00
So these are completely 3D, like CGI, maybe people? Not 3D, not 3D. Not 3D.
SPEAKER_04
19:02 - 19:18
So I photo very photorealistic if not photorealistic, but like there are when you look real close you can see some weird things going on at the background here's a little messed up. This arm is not to the right person She's sitting on an extra piece of skin here somehow. I see you've analyzed this.
SPEAKER_02
19:18 - 19:26
Yeah, me and my friends have been passed this round cuz like no, no, no, this and you're incorrect that arms and perfect purpose. It's just there's a string from that other girls bikini on it
SPEAKER_05
19:27 - 19:28
Uh, and now continues.
SPEAKER_04
19:28 - 19:29
I'm just saying so.
SPEAKER_05
19:29 - 19:31
So that would have been hand-thinking zoom in.
SPEAKER_02
19:31 - 19:33
Is that a string? No, I think you're right. I think it's a fold.
SPEAKER_05
19:33 - 19:36
Zoom in on that spot for people just listening.
SPEAKER_02
19:36 - 19:40
Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. It's nonsense. We're looking at that. The hand goes the wrong way. Oh, that's wild.
SPEAKER_04
19:40 - 19:59
There's already apparently only fans accounts that are being taken over and being tricked by guys running them. Of course. Just these kind of fake girls that aren't real people. And look real. These are all fake. Yeah. like look at the like that even that's not a real door kind of to begin with. Wow. The hands or the fingers here a little off.
SPEAKER_02
19:59 - 20:09
That's insane. And so this is right now just still images and eventually it'll be film. Eventually it'll be unrecognizable. You won't be able to discern whether it's an actual person.
SPEAKER_05
20:10 - 20:19
I mean, in terms of obviously much of human civilization is driven by sex. I mean, there was a time we didn't have easily accessible porn. Right. And that changed a lot.
SPEAKER_01
20:19 - 20:19
Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
20:19 - 20:25
I don't think we've actually quite caught up to how much he changed the nature of human civilization. Just poor, easily accessible porn.
SPEAKER_02
20:26 - 20:59
Yeah, I talk about it on stage right now. It's very weird. It's, it's, it's very weird for kids. You really think about what's happening with kids. Like any kid that has a smartphone. People just leave their, give your kid a phone just leave him alone. Like they just go, they go to school, they go to their friend's house. They have that phone independently of you. They could look at whatever the fuck they want. Somebody's shit that I see just on Instagram. I don't know how these guys are doing it. And I don't know how it's getting recommended in my feed, but it's like videos people get murdered. You know, see a lot of those? Simulated porn.
SPEAKER_04
20:59 - 21:02
I haven't seen that stuff.
SPEAKER_02
21:02 - 21:03
You and I have different algorithms.
SPEAKER_04
21:06 - 21:12
But then someone gets taken down for something that's like, they call it porn and it's not porn or something like, whoa, are you guys not to see what else is on this?
SPEAKER_02
21:12 - 21:34
I think right, what's going on is that they're managing at scale. I think it's virtually impossible to stop all that stuff from coming in and people that have individual situations or people get banned. I mean, I don't know why they're getting banned. Are they getting banned because of an algorithm? Are they getting banned because they post misinformation or what are they getting banned for?
SPEAKER_04
21:36 - 21:45
harassment photos. Someone was joking about a friend, you know, like the Pope. They get reported. Yeah. Oh, I don't know how it's all working when it breaks down the individual circumstances.
SPEAKER_05
21:45 - 22:15
You had a good conversation with Jordan Peterson. He was talking about the more you have this kind of virtualization, the more you allow the psychopaths to reign free. So like the more we have artificially generated porn, the more we have artificially generated violence, photo realistic violence. The more you make it normal for you to be basically a psychopath in a digital space. and enable that and make that okay and then you forget what it's like to actually be a good human being.
SPEAKER_02
22:15 - 23:18
And then also part of the problem may be that we may very well be looking at a world, whether it's 10 years from now, 20 years from now, whatever it is, where these children that have grown up in this environment now have a completely different way of looking at people in the world because of all these interactions they have. It's flavor, their personality. And then we move into a digital world. I mean, we're not there yet in terms of virtual reality. It's not good enough. I mean, this, I think that's what we're seeing with the metafalier. People were expecting a lot of people were just going to dive in and start wearing goggles all over the house. But it's not quite there yet. It's also something weird for people. There's something really weird about wearing these head goggles and walk. It's really fun. I really enjoy the boxing games. You've ever done that? No, in Vienna. They're great. You get to work out. You legitimately get to work out because you're actually sparring against a computer character. It's throwing punches at you. You're moving your head. And so you have these things in your hands and you know you get tired. It's good.
SPEAKER_05
23:18 - 23:19
It feels realistic.
SPEAKER_02
23:20 - 23:59
a little bit, you know, when you get hit with a punch, your face will light up, you get a flash of light, which is kind of cool, because you're like, oh, Jesus, you know, you feel it, you're getting hit. There's some really fun games. There's one where you walk a plank across these two buildings and you get the win whistle and share. But that one is terrifying. There's zombie ones. There's a lot of cool ones, but people are just not buying into it the way they buy into Xbox and PlayStation. They're not like wholesale committed to this yet, but they will be. It's going to be so fucking good that instead of like having it in a goggle form where it's like this big clunky thing on you, it's going to be very easy to do.
SPEAKER_05
23:59 - 25:58
When they get to that, I've been revisiting some classic books recently. She's doing a reading list and one of them that captures this extremely well that I recommend. I think most people read in middle school or something, but it's actually very relevant as Brave New World. So a lot of people, including Jordan Peterson, worry about 1984, sort of a totalitarian, a dystopia that represents a totalitarian state. But Brave New World has a, there's no centralized government that's like dogmatic, controlling everything, surveilling everything. They're basically created this world where sex is easy, everyone's promiscuous, genetic engineering removes any kind of diversity, any kind of interesting dark, bad diversity that we would think of. The hunter is Thomson's and the the Bukowski's the the weirdos of society and then he gives you drugs so much that it basically gives you pleasure whenever you want if you start feeling a little too shady by your life and that's actually close it up close it to us and it doesn't seem if you I mean the way he writes about it, it sounds bad like we don't want that But then you start to ask a question and like well at which point would we realize it's bad because it's constantly obviously we should do generic engineering to remove any kind of like Maladies that we have any kind of diseases like everything is an obvious step forward But then the place you end up at just like with with sex like is a good to have artificial images of as many as you want as much point as you want as much sex as you want as that good as much as awesome stuff as you want is that good is that what human flourishing looks like Or do you want to have some constraints, some limitations, some finiteness of resources, some scarcity, maybe that's actually fundamental for human happiness. Having too much of awesome stuff, maybe that destroys the possibility of real meaningful deep happiness.
SPEAKER_02
25:59 - 29:37
It certainly does. But I think the question really becomes, are we going to stay people? Because I don't think we are. I think we're moving in that general direction anyway. I think that probably is why we have this, I mean, it's almost inevitable if you have this addiction to cell phone issue, because everybody has that. If you have a cell phone and you're on your social media apps during the day and you're on YouTube, You're probably addicted. Whether you realize it or not, and the number of hours that you put on those things is shocking. When you actually look at your screen time, you're like six hours. What was on my phone for six hours? What the fuck did I do? And you'll try to rationalize it and justify it. What that's doing to young people has got to be very strange. And if that, along with all the contaminants that are affecting the way people develop, which are, you know, Dr. Shana Swan from the book Countdown talks about this, talks about thallates and plastics and how you can trace back to like the 1950s when they really started using a lot of plastics and petrochemical products that started getting into people's bodies and the form of falades it started diminishing sperm count and small smaller penises and testicles and taints and more more miscarriages for women lower fertility rates all that is she believes is directly correlated with the data that they've done already on mammals when they do that to mammals, you know, in tests, the more foul aids they enter into their system, the more they have issues like this. So we're becoming almost like, we're becoming like less able to procreate naturally. And if we get to a point where the human races future, it's the only way we're going to be able to procreate is some sort of genetic engineering. and some sort of artificial womb or some sort of a system that they develop that allows you to combine you and your partners DNA and create a new child. That's that seems to me like you if you're gonna do that and you started engineering out very specific aspects of people that are problematic, anger, greed, jealousy, lust, all these different things. You would turn people into some sort of sexless thing that gets its pleasure by manipulating its neurochemistry through some electronics, through something, maybe it's something you take so they can control it. But that's not far off of the path of possibility. If you really looked at where we're going now and if the fertility rates drop, if they really do and I know people a lot smarter than me are actually worried about like Elon's worried. about the amount of children that people have. There was a thing today on Italy. I was reading this article on Italy where they were talking about how the population's very old and they're not having a lot of kids. And like this is unsustainable. You can only do this for so long before you don't have anybody living there anymore. And we don't think of that as being a possibility, but doesn't take that long. Nobody has kids for there to be no more people left. like how many hundred years like if nobody has kids hundred years now there's no people it's real simple you have to make people and how many do you have to make and can you make them because you might want to start making them when you're 37 and you might go to a doctor and the doctor's like well this is touching go you're gonna have to do in vitro fertilization and then you go through all this shit and you're taking shots and you're you're fucking you're timing everything and
SPEAKER_05
29:38 - 29:47
And on top of that, if you're not, by the way, it's still getting funny audio every once in a while. Oh, that's weird because I don't, it'd be a good fun.
SPEAKER_02
29:47 - 29:53
Yeah, I just unplug it and pull it back in. Sorry. How's that? Check, check, check.
SPEAKER_05
29:53 - 30:02
Check, check. I don't know. It's better. It's usually better. 98% of better. Oh, no, it's still dropping out, dropping in. Hmm. Interesting.
SPEAKER_02
30:02 - 30:17
Maybe we got a bad headphone. Once you grab that headphone right there. I mean, yeah. Yeah, maybe that headphones gone dead. These are old as fuck. Probably need new ones. No, but I mean, it's just like, how many people thrown up on that and fucking?
SPEAKER_05
30:17 - 30:19
How many people have thrown up on that?
SPEAKER_02
30:19 - 30:22
How many people have been drunk as fuck and bang that off the table?
SPEAKER_05
30:22 - 30:25
I mean, people have worn these headphones. Like the legendary.
SPEAKER_02
30:25 - 30:45
Oh, a lot of fucking people have worn those headphones. It is weird. Like, no one even thinks about it. You just kind of put them on. But, you know, if it was like a toilet seat, Yeah, you would, you would be like Jesus, naked butts right here, but it's years. It's like skin and face and interesting.
SPEAKER_05
30:45 - 30:48
Still, still weird. But it's fine. It's not too bad.
SPEAKER_04
30:48 - 30:49
There must be something wrong with that connection.
SPEAKER_05
30:49 - 30:51
Yeah, there must be a connection thing.
SPEAKER_02
30:51 - 30:52
But it's really pause and try to figure it out.
SPEAKER_04
30:53 - 30:54
We can do that for a second.
SPEAKER_02
30:54 - 30:58
Okay, we'll pause. We'll be right back, folks. It seems to be working now. Yeah, it seems to be working now.
SPEAKER_05
30:58 - 31:33
So where were we? Oh, and people becoming... Not having sex anymore. Yeah, people becoming... On top of that. I do think if we're not careful, I think there's exciting positive possibilities, but there's also negative possibilities of these AI systems, like Chad GBT, but later versions, forming deep meaningful connections with human beings. Well, most of your... friends. No, most of your intimacy in terms of friendships and like a deep connection with an intelligent entity comes from AI systems.
SPEAKER_02
31:33 - 31:47
Did you imagine if you're driving to work and you in the AR just having a conversation shoot in the shit and the AI is really funny and the AI is your buddy. Like, Lags, what's going on? Bro, what are we doing? Lex, what are we doing with this bullshit job? Fuck this place.
SPEAKER_01
31:47 - 31:48
Let's go home.
SPEAKER_02
31:48 - 31:53
Yeah. Let's have ice cream and your laugh and I got work to do. I know fucking around. You imagine.
SPEAKER_05
31:53 - 32:00
Yeah, what are you doing with our girlfriend? Yeah, she keeps being mean to you nagging you all the time. You don't need her.
SPEAKER_02
32:00 - 32:05
I'm gonna off like a bitch, Lex. Yeah, why do that? I'm not gonna respect you. You're gonna have to break up with her just so she respects you.
SPEAKER_05
32:05 - 32:06
Why don't you murder her, Lex?
SPEAKER_02
32:06 - 34:49
Yeah, Lex. There's a way to get away with it. I'm just saying, joking around, buddy. Joking around. Next thing you know, it's talking you in this one. This episode is brought to you by Moan. Homes are a big investment. You want to protect them from fires, break-ins, and especially water. Water damage is a lot more frequent. And something as small as a leaky pipe can lead to big problems down the road. And it can also be hard to detect. since you know most pipes are hidden behind a wall. That's why you guys need the mowing smart water monitor and shut off. It's a device that can automatically shut down your home's water when a leak is detected and it also works 24-7 monitoring and tracking your home even when you're not there. It'll alert you through the app at the first sign of a leak providing ultimate peace of mind and security. Learn more and buy the moan smart water monitor and shut off at moan.com slash flow. And right now, Use the code Rogan to get 5% off free shipping and a free leak detector. That's code Rogan at M-O-E-N dot com slash FL-O. Automatic shutoff and real time alert capabilities will operate when the device is configured with the proper settings. This episode is brought to you by Mizzon and Maine. No matter where you're listening, no matter what job you have, the clothes you wear to work say a lot about you. And if you're wearing boring, stiff, uncomfortable dress shirts, well, now might be the time to ditch some of the dated boring styles in your workplace wardrobes. And that's exactly what Mizzon and Maine is for. When I wear my shirt, I feel like I'm not sacrificing comfort for style. They're performance fabric, dress shirts, feel just as good as they look. And you could put on a misdemean and dress for the job you have. You will see it hanging in your closet and genuinely get excited to put it on. And if you're still dry cleaning your dress shirts, you're living in the past. Welcome to 2024, where Ms. and Maine has the world's most comfortable machine washable dress shirts. Ms. and Maine invented the performance fabric dress shirt 10 years ago, and they've practically perfected the thing. It's lightweight, breathable, moisture-wicking, wrinkle-resistant, and the most comfortable shirt on the market. Whatever you do, and wherever you wear it, know that you'll look and feel amazing. Shop now at masoninmain.com and save 20% when you spend $130 or more using the promo code Joe Rogan. With a fucking body bag.
SPEAKER_04
34:49 - 34:52
Did you hear the story about that guy that Googled all this stuff about what to do with your body bag?
SPEAKER_02
34:52 - 35:32
Oh my god, he Googled to like 930 in the morning. That sick fuck like how dumb I guess something look we we know this is fact we know some people are just really fucking dumb They really can't see the future. I want to know if that guy was on anything to I want to know if he was on any kind of psych meds You know, can you tell me this? Oh, so guy killed his wife, man. And they they found his Google search. It's horrific. It's like how to dismember a body. How long does it take for a body to dissolve? It's like, oh, is it best to cut someone up or move them whole? Like what the he just Googled the most. And he did it for like the entire night into the morning.
SPEAKER_05
35:32 - 35:34
Is there results for that and a Google search?
SPEAKER_02
35:35 - 36:04
What happens if you put body parts in ammonia? How to clean blood from a wooden floor? Dismemberment and the best ways to dispose of a body. Can identification be made on partial remains? How long does DNA last? Like what the fuck man? How long for a body starts to smell? Can you be charged with murder without a body? This guy is fucking, it's so sick. So this dude just goes through Google all night long. Trying to figure out how to get away with murder.
SPEAKER_05
36:04 - 36:07
Well, he might actually get off on just asking the question.
SPEAKER_02
36:07 - 36:13
Right? No. No, because then they found a bloody knife. Yeah, like he went. They found. Yeah, they found.
SPEAKER_05
36:13 - 36:18
I'm not like pushing back. I'm just saying he might also get off on. I don't think he's getting off at all.
SPEAKER_02
36:18 - 36:22
I think he has a chance of getting off. That could have been a lot of questions.
SPEAKER_05
36:22 - 37:11
They found the knife human nature after maybe I'm naive in this, but I watched the the domer documentary. Yeah. No, that the documentary. the movie the movie and then also the documentaries it's like it gives you a very different perspective on what like are you a dorm or sympathizer now boy no no okay no but like it makes you realize no it makes you realize that some people's brain is broken Yes, yeah, I think so and that's like yeah, and then some people's brain might be a little bit broken and then there's still functioning members of society by there might be extreme narcissists that might be sociopath psychopaths and you have to kind of understand that the world is full of potentially not not full of but has some charming psychopaths walking around a hundred percent
SPEAKER_02
37:11 - 37:30
And some of them are probably like really successful like hedge funds and shit. Yeah. Now people that can just like move money around and people that are CEO of certain companies that might be making products of kill people. No body, lots of Googling murder case against Brian Walsh, maybe hard to prove experts say, but I thought they had a knife in the blood.
SPEAKER_04
37:30 - 37:33
That's was a couple days ago, so Friday, I guess.
SPEAKER_02
37:33 - 38:27
Oh, okay. I had read that they found a bloody knife. Just the whole thing is so fucked. But I want to know if he's on something. I'd be really fascinated because there's certain drugs that will like alleviate, you won't worry about shit. So maybe he's like not worrying about like Googling all the stuff. Oh, it's all going to work out. You know, I'm gonna kill her, but it's all gonna work out, and he's like, Googling. Or he might be on speed. You know, a lot of people are on speed, man. A lot of people are on Adderall. It's fucking stunning. It's stunning how many, like hyped up people we have out there are really like, we have a speed culture. It makes you very efficient. You get shit done. They've got plenty of energy, and some people love it. And like how much is that flavoring our culture? Wouldn't it be nice to get rid of that? Flex, and phase that out?
SPEAKER_05
38:28 - 38:29
All drugs? Yeah, in general.
SPEAKER_02
38:29 - 38:39
Oh, problems with mind. Mm-hmm. Much or so only. Well, you could do it that way, but that takes a lot of work. Or we could just genetically engineer it from the jump.
SPEAKER_05
38:39 - 38:54
No more emotions. No more emotions. Because emotions, you know, life is suffering. The CSK needs you. Ultimately, you're going to every good thing you have. Eventually, you're going to lose every hello with the person you love is eventually going to be a goodbye. Why say hello every.
SPEAKER_02
38:54 - 39:41
Why say hello every again? Why? Why doesn't have to be like that? Like we have this idea in our head that this way we live is like ultimately because to us it provides emotions and because it creates dilemmas and solutions and conflict and resolution there's so much going on in our minds all the time when it comes to interacting with each other that we feel like it's imperative for existence. But why? It's just because it's the only way we've known. You know, we all have to suffer in order. But why do you have to suffer in order to be happy? Wouldn't it be better if you just happy? What do we really fucking need to suffer? Couldn't that be engineered out? Now, this is coming from a person who purposely suffers all the time so that I could stay happy. And it does work.
SPEAKER_05
39:41 - 40:24
But God, I have to do it that way. Well, there's an incredible computation machine we call evolution that has constructed human beings. You want to mess with that? You want to get a bunch of, you want to get a few software engineers from San Francisco to mess with the computation system that is evolution. That is Earth. This giant computer that for billions of years spent a billion years on bacteria trying to figure shit out before it advanced. And now, with all of these incredible stages, this entire ecosystem that we call life on Earth probably planted here by aliens. That, and recently these monkeys started to get super clever and now we're going to completely change everything. Yes.
SPEAKER_02
40:24 - 40:31
You know why? Why? Because that's a part of it. Yeah. That is a part of evolution. Is the monkeys figuring out how to fuck with everything?
SPEAKER_05
40:31 - 40:39
Well, that's probably why we haven't have any definitive evidence of aliens from out there because the monkeys have actually started fucking with X and destroy them.
SPEAKER_02
40:39 - 40:49
They turned themselves into starfish. Whoops. Yeah, you're super genius for like six months and then you become a fucking jellyfish. I mean, that's a threat.
SPEAKER_05
40:49 - 40:56
Yeah, maybe word. Make me. I mean, there's so many possible trajectories here that end up in what we would think of as boring.
SPEAKER_02
40:56 - 43:11
I had a very interesting conversation with Eric one-time and we're going to talk about it on the podcast from a physics standpoint. this uh... he's very perplexed about the ufo thing and what's interesting is like he's one of those guys like a lot of very smart people that we're like it's all horses it's all bullshit but now he's come around to what the fuck is going on what's his take well he doesn't have a take necessarily but he's looking at all the data and all the evidence we're gonna have a whole long conversation about it but essentially There's one of two possibilities. Either shit is coming from somewhere else or it's coming from here. So either we or someone has some real legitimate groundbreaking technology or someone's visiting us from somewhere else. There's no way of fans or butts. It's one of the, because now there's enough data that show that these things are moving in a way that they can understand. There's a video that they're moving in a way that they can't understand. They're not showing a heat signature from visible means of propulsion. It's not like a rocket. It's like whatever they're doing. They're doing something different. And then Commander David Fraver, who you talk to that tick-tech experience, if they really did track something that went from above 50,000 feet above sea level to 50 feet in less than a second, what the fuck is that? Like, if that's real, We're assuming that all the their calibration was on and all their equipment worked together, but it was multiple different visual sightings of this thing too. Different jets are different people, uniform story, everybody's talked about how it just moved off it, it's saying rates of speed and then there's all these other ones like Ryan Long and all these other people that He flew with that are seeing these similar behaviors from these things, where they just disappear. They move off at insane rates of speed, so it's one of two things. Either he said there's been some sort of parallel science, some science that's going on where nobody knew about it, and all the top physicists were completely unaware of this tech. and they were developing independently in some fucking lab in the mountains for the government, or aliens.
SPEAKER_05
43:11 - 44:58
Or someone else does a bunch of other options. And one thing is, I just talked to David Kipping, a highly recommend is YouTube channel Cool Worlds, he's a legit, that's a humorment. sometimes get these like legit scientists who are also good communicators. So he's he's like the human of astronomy Young guy, you probably have him on eventually. I'm better. Sure. There's all that money. He's brilliant brilliant. I'd definitely check out the channel. Anyway, he's an astronomer so he's deep in the astronomer astrophysics community and he says and you've said this before too is he tries to really hard Not to think about stuff he wants to be true like a very kind of calibrated properly because with the UFO sightings there is a part of you I don't know why exactly, but you kind of want it to be true not kind of like all the way how about the 98% of it to be true? And there you have to be a little bit careful, but yeah, it definitely, like to me, it feels like the scientific development that we're doing now with Starship, so SpaceX and Starship with all the advancement telescopes, we're just getting more and more more data to where we're not going to have these shitty videos. We're going to have high resolution understanding. And because it's becoming more okay to talk about aliens, I think the actual scientific community has a bigger humility about the topic to where they're expanding. The window of their study to consider all kinds of physical phenomena, all kinds of observation, all kinds of sources of data and signals and so on to where I would hope we would get definitive signals of alien life.
SPEAKER_02
44:59 - 45:21
yeah definitive definitive like when you when you look at the capabilities of satellites today like satellite imagery how how good are they and how how how many of them are up there that they could direct to a very specific area and get really good video or photographs I mean, it's incredible.
SPEAKER_05
45:21 - 45:33
It's really, really good. So why would you cover the whole, you're talking about going from thousands to tens of thousands to potentially hundreds of thousands in a couple of decades?
SPEAKER_02
45:33 - 45:35
Are they capable of imagery, the Starlink ones?
SPEAKER_05
45:35 - 45:40
Yeah, yes. They're all capable of imagery, but they're not that's not their purpose.
SPEAKER_02
45:40 - 45:58
Right. So they're that's the internet. But what about for visual when they have spy satellites or satellites that can look down and see everything's going on in the city? How good are those? They say they can read license plates from space. Yeah. Yeah. Is that real? I think that's real. Yeah. Okay. But how prevalent are they?
SPEAKER_05
45:58 - 46:51
that's that I don't know because like the capability I think is there to high resolution image everything but I don't know how much how much desire there is for that kind of application because there's so much more for other for other kinds of applications so like low resolution imaging for mapping purposes and so on imaging for military purposes there's applications but that's like very specific kind of application I just don't know It's like James Webb telescope, right? There's like huge battles going on on what that thing should do. Because there's a lot of, it's a constrained resource. You have to battle of what are the interesting questions, where should it look, what's the resolution of data, where in this guy should collect that data, how frequent and so on. And that same kind of way, there's probably battles over satellite resources of what should it be true.
SPEAKER_02
46:51 - 46:53
Sure. Especially with intelligence agencies and stuff.
SPEAKER_05
46:54 - 46:58
Especially because the intelligence agencies are probably resisting this UFO stuff.
SPEAKER_02
46:58 - 47:38
If I was an evil dictator, and I wanted to get my government to have control over the skies and to be able to see anything from anywhere at any time. And I wanted to have master valence drones in the sky above cities. One of a good way would be aliens. But we have to capture these things on video. And there's only one way. We're going to deploy these high resolution video cameras in the sky and capture everything. And there's sightings every day. It won't be a matter of time before we have real high resolution photo of something we can definitively prove as not ours. It's not of this, right?
SPEAKER_05
47:38 - 47:49
What do you think there's what's signed the fuck up? You think there's that much excitement about aliens? Like, it's ultimately why are aliens so interesting? To me, philosophical and scientifically, it's a super interesting question.
SPEAKER_02
47:51 - 48:45
just even the question are we alone that's really exciting but it's not you think people would vote to pay for that versus to pay for you don't want them voting for that just do it just do it just like the fucking these these bills that get past we're not voting on those bills right representatives they just do it they just do it they just put them in the sky with the aliens a common we got to do something people would That would be the new climate change. It's like aliens. Oh, the aliens are coming. And you're there with us against the aliens? Or you with the aliens? What are you a fucking traitor? You're going to give us up to the aliens you piece of shit? And so there's going to be some sort of a ideological conflict on Earth. Whether or not we donate money to the defenses. Like the Democrats who want to defend against the aliens, the Republicans who are going to be like, hey, let's just hear him talk first. And we're going to fucking giant dilemma here.
SPEAKER_05
48:46 - 49:09
Yeah, I hope aliens are, if they're out there, I hope they're detectable by us humans and we can interact with them, probably not communicate with them. But from my perspective, you have to be humble. Advancing on the civilizations are probably so sophisticated that we dumb descendants of apes cannot possibly even detect them.
SPEAKER_02
49:09 - 49:28
I have a feeling there's all sorts of ways that they could be. And some of them could be undetectable. They might be made of light. Who knows? But other ones are going to be just a little bit ahead of us. There's an infinite number of them. And there's going to be an infinite number of ones. Sure they will. For a thousand years ahead of us, you don't think they can get to us?
SPEAKER_05
49:28 - 49:30
Yes, based trial was really difficult.
SPEAKER_02
49:30 - 49:37
Sure, it is. But if they figure out some new technology within a thousand years, that's not outside the realm of possibility.
SPEAKER_05
49:37 - 49:55
For sure. But then they figured out all other kinds of technologies that enable them to navigate complicated life forms that are unlike them and to be able to study them and to manipulate them and all that kind of stuff. Without them knowing about it. Why would you have them know about it?
SPEAKER_02
49:55 - 51:24
Well, the idea could be that you want to kind of plant the seeds of this idea because it's so shocking to the psyche of these very fragile apes. You'd be careful with the fragile apes. Yeah, you would have to, well, you have to think about what we are, right? We're real close to like what we were a million years ago. We're real close to like very violent hair covered barbaric animals. And now we have thermonuclear weapons. And now we have satellite imagery and cell phones. And we're close to some new thing. And I think if I was an alien, I would want to watch. I would want to watch this very bizarre transition because like if you could study, look, think about all the things we go to study that are so boring. We guys dedicate their whole life to find a new fern. You know, and what, what are we? You know, we're the most fascinating fucking thing in the known universe by far. If we didn't know about people, if we were some logical creature from somewhere else, and we found people and we would be like, holy shit! You know, wait do you see these fucking guys? They've a popularity contest. Who controls the weapons? They're all like obviously paid off by these corporations and special interest groups and everybody's like, oh, good. These politicians, they make hundreds of millions of dollars on a job that pays $100,000 a year. And we're like, what?
SPEAKER_05
51:26 - 51:45
But the fuck is going on? Well, from if they're observing us, do you think humans stand out that much from the rest of the life on earth? Because it could be the same kind of life force that you just described some basic stuff, some basic dynamics of interactions between species that could be equally as fascinating as the interaction between ants.
SPEAKER_02
51:46 - 52:45
Well, I think those are fascinating too. I don't think anybody would think that ants aren't fascinating. Answer fascinating to us. I'm sure ants would be fascinating to someone from another planet that doesn't know what ants are. But ants can't nuke the whole fucking planet a hundred times over and point and weapons at each other and like we have a weird ability. to change the surface of the earth. We created these structures that that rise hundreds and hundreds of feet into the sky. They're all made out of glass like we're wild. We're so different than any other animal. I mean, yeah, there's a lot of fascinating other animals, lions are fascinating. Zebras are fascinating. Everything's fascinating, but not like us. No, if you came here from another planet, the first thing we would go is like, these crazy talking monkeys are out of control. And you would just start rattling off what they do. You talk about real housewives and Beverly Hills. You would talk about rock stars. You would talk about the internet. You would talk about TikTok, phone addictions or what we think it's fascinating.
SPEAKER_05
52:45 - 54:00
or just like Chad GBT and GPT-123, they see that as a trivial consequence of evolution that you just increase the competition power of the brain, you're going to start getting these kinds of interactions because they know what happens in the next thousands of years. They understand the general trajectory. We don't know that trajectory. It could be AI. AI and then there's stages in the development of AI and the kind of system of creates, maybe you'll be one collective intelligence that encompasses the whole world where it's no longer individual entities, it's one intelligence that's trying to solve nuclear fusion and achieve type 1, Kardashev scale civilization that's unable to become a multiplayer species. They know this whole development is trivial to them. They're going to yawn. Or maybe they know that this is the stage where it's inevitable that these creatures destroy themselves. Because in order to achieve this level of intelligence, there has to be a fundamental desire for conflict. And the better the weapons get, the more the conflict will enable them to destroy themselves. If not to nuclear weapons, then through AI, through generic engineering, through all kinds of stuff.
SPEAKER_02
54:00 - 55:15
map maybe that's where aliens come in and maybe what aliens are is like a caretaker of this process yeah which is why you know one of the things about UFO folklore when they drop fat man and little boy when they drop those bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki like UFO sightings there's a like a pretty big uptick yeah and we're talking about like why do people want that why do they want the aliens to be there I think because we realize How many questions we have? We realize, like, how little we really know. We know so much, but so little, and we don't have much time. We live for a hundred years if everything goes great. We don't know what's right in terms of nutrition. Someone will tell you, this is terrible for you. Another one will tell you, that's essential for you. for human development. You're like, what? We don't know what's the right way to educate people. You hear that our school systems are great. They just need more funding. And you hear, no, they've designed to make factory workers out of rural people. They were designed to take like people that had wild folks and make them sit in a fucking chair and do everything and go by factory bells every day. Well, both those things are true. All right.
SPEAKER_05
55:15 - 56:18
It's like, with the same time. They might look at us and see this is amazing I live a very short amount of time We were over dramatic and emotional We fall in love and then there's heartbreak and you lose the people you love You go to water each other and through that process of war formed some of the strongest possible bonds that any two entities can with the people you fight alongside with and then somehow You form these different hierarchies where people hunger for power and And destroy other human beings through that desire for power for greed and all that. Oh, no doubt. And then all of it, the individual life itself, the human condition is deeply meaningful because of all those constraints, because of all that uncertainty in the mystery. There might be jealous because they figured all their shit out and they're just Maybe that's where at the stage where, because we haven't figured out most things, life is beautiful. Like life can be beautiful in this way that they'll know they can't.
SPEAKER_02
56:18 - 56:42
What I was saying, those, that's why we are looking to them, because we have all these questions about what we're doing. Yeah, but that's why we're so fascinated by the idea of an alien. They might be looking at us the way we look at Western movies. We romanticize the bullshit aspect of taking a fucking wagon with stupid wooden wheels and wobbling your way across the mountain side or the Indian Shoot arrows at you. Yeah. There's a terrible way to win.
SPEAKER_05
56:42 - 56:56
What if? What if they know that asking questions and not knowing the answers is way more meaningful and full of the possibility of happiness than having all the answers.
SPEAKER_02
56:56 - 57:48
It's totally possible, or this idea of what isn't meaningful as trivial. And it's only a consequence of our monkey brains trying to grasp for a reason. And that once we've transcended that and moved into this next stage of evolution, which we would hope they are, we would realize how foolish these primal notions that we had, what the purpose they served was just to get us to the dance, just to figure out the computers, figure out all the technology, and then let us transcend at the next stage of existence, which removes all of our primal comp, all of our different emotions and all of our different problematic forms of expression, violence, and greed, and lust, and deception, and all those things, just eliminate all of it. Everything that's a problem.
SPEAKER_05
57:48 - 57:50
Brave New World.
SPEAKER_02
57:50 - 58:37
It's both, right? Do you think someone's going to be in control of it? So it's like that's a scary thing. It's like part 1984 with the W.E.F. and part brave new world with everything else. It's like we're we're we're definitely living in a time. We're certain people with a lot of resources are trying to figure out how to control people. That's the fact they always have. It's a natural part of what human beings do. and they used to do with kings and armies and if they could do it digitally, they'll do it that way. People are, they love to tell people what they can't do and they love to control people and extract resources and extraordinary amount or extraordinary rate for almost nothing. They will love to do that. Can I just steal money? Can I just tell people what to do and steal their money? Yeah, you can. You've got to be at the top of the food chain and one of those crazy organizations.
SPEAKER_05
58:37 - 59:07
Do you think it's really as possible to to move beyond this stage, is it possible this is the optimal? This greed, the possibility of other people being able to control you because of greed or desire for power, the weird relationship we have with sex, of always chasing it and not getting it and then getting it and then that weird dynamic, then the pleasure you get from a good stake or food, all of that, just the pleasures or whatever the hell music is.
SPEAKER_02
59:08 - 01:00:34
This episode is brought to you by Rocket Money. How much do you think you're paying in subscriptions every month? The answer is probably more than you think. Over 74% of people have subscriptions they've forgotten about. Thanks to Rocket Money, I'm no longer wasting money on the ones that I forgot about. Rocket Money is a personal finance app that finds and cancels your unwanted subscriptions. Monitor your spending and helps lower your bills so that you can grow your savings. With Rocket Money, you have full control over your subscriptions and a clear view of your expenses. You can see all of your subscriptions in one place and if you see something you don't want, Rocket Money can help you cancel it in a few taps. Rocket Money has over 5 million users and has saved a total of $500 million in canceled subscriptions, saving members up to $740 a year when using all the apps features, stop wasting money on things you don't use, cancel your on one of subscriptions by going to rocketmoney.com slash JRE. That's rocketmoney.com slash JRE. Rocketmoney.com slash JRE. This episode is brought to you by Doctor Squatch. I'm going to let you in on a secret. If you want to be more confident, you have to start taking care of yourself. And a great way to do that is use Dr. Squatch, especially with their new private hygiene products.
SPEAKER_01
01:00:34 - 01:01:10
They were designed to help you look and feel fresh all over. like the growing guardian trimmer. It's perfect for grooming above and below the waist and the ball barrier dry lotion helps manage sweat and chafing while beast wipes keep you clean front to back. It's the care your body deserves. Try them today. Whether you're new to Dr. Squatch or you use it every day, get 15% off your order by going to Dr. Squatch.com slash JRE15 or use the code JRE15 at checkout.
SPEAKER_02
01:01:10 - 01:01:31
Whatever the help music is, it's the best question, right? Because all the other ones, if it seems like those are just human rewards. Right. Like the reason why it feels good to have sex is because if you have sex, then your jeans carry on. So it gives your reward. It's really a nice biological trick. So it's food. Taste great. Good for you. You'll stay alive. You need to, you need nourishment for your body to smell it.
SPEAKER_05
01:01:31 - 01:01:38
Not why you love it. That's because of the human rewards. No, no, no. That's a simplistic explanation.
SPEAKER_01
01:01:38 - 01:01:38
Sure.
SPEAKER_05
01:01:38 - 01:01:43
It's not that it's not explaining the subject of reality or what it feels like. Of course.
SPEAKER_04
01:01:43 - 01:01:44
Fasting a lot.
SPEAKER_05
01:01:44 - 01:01:47
But it's also true eating a good steak. Oh, yeah.
SPEAKER_02
01:01:47 - 01:01:55
Well, I can't explain that with the butt. But on the cold and taking a hot shower. I mean, you're in the cold for days camping and they take a hot shower. So grace feeling you'll ever had in your life.
SPEAKER_05
01:01:55 - 01:02:11
Yeah, you can do an evolutionary biology explanation, but how do you, you can, you can reduce every beautiful human experience to a biological explanation, but I think you actually lose a lot of the things that aliens are jealous of.
SPEAKER_02
01:02:11 - 01:02:55
You, well, I don't think aliens are jealous. I think they got rid of that part. That's the point of first-generalization. It's beautiful for us. It's beautiful for us. It's not, I'm not saying it's not beautiful. It's beautiful for us. It does create things that we currently enjoy. We enjoy art. We enjoy expression. We enjoy a painful song. We enjoy, like when Janice Joplin sings piece of my heart, you hear the pain in her voice. You can hear it. I mean, you can relate to that when you listen to it, that incredible voice you had. Like that's, you know, that's that woman's like essence coming out in the sound that she made with her mouth. You know, for us, it's amazing.
SPEAKER_05
01:02:56 - 01:03:01
Speaking of her mouth, she broke the heart of Leonard Cohen after she gave him head.
SPEAKER_02
01:03:01 - 01:03:02
Spook is heart? Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
01:03:02 - 01:03:10
How's your break is heart? Well, she didn't want, uh, um, he fell in love with her and he didn't want to be the, she didn't want to be with him.
SPEAKER_02
01:03:10 - 01:03:16
Oh, and we're Leonard. Crimean River, jazz shop on blue. Yeah, move on. Got a great story.
SPEAKER_05
01:03:16 - 01:03:32
He wrote a good song about it too. Did he? Um, Chelsea, hotel number six. I think it's cool. You gave me head, uh, something. I forgot how to. And I think she said, which was not very nice, that he was a bad lay.
SPEAKER_02
01:03:32 - 01:04:07
Oh, yeah, maybe once. Yeah, well, you know. When someone make it a good song about head, Uh, I remember you well in the Chelsea hotel you were talking so brave and so sweet given me head on the unmade bed while the limousines wait in the street. First of all, someone's a bit of a chatty, Kathy. Okay. How about keep that fucking store it to yourself? No, he didn't say it. Yeah, but everybody's gonna know you'll need a shame, jazz job, which is a nice, why is it shameful? Are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are you, are
SPEAKER_05
01:04:07 - 01:04:10
And it's not some hotels in New York. What are you talking about?
SPEAKER_02
01:04:10 - 01:04:16
Oh, it's better. It's better because it's in New York. Don't stop checking Detroit. Hold it. Just keep it together until you land on the East Coast.
SPEAKER_05
01:04:17 - 01:04:22
All right, so the Washington was John Wick, and I don't know if it's not the one, which also takes place in New York.
SPEAKER_01
01:04:22 - 01:04:24
That devil loving.
SPEAKER_05
01:04:24 - 01:04:28
What is driving with the Lamborghini or Ferrari in that? Which movie? Sounds like a woman.
SPEAKER_02
01:04:28 - 01:04:29
That's the devil. That's the devil.
SPEAKER_03
01:04:29 - 01:04:30
That's the devil. That's the devil.
SPEAKER_01
01:04:30 - 01:04:40
That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil.
SPEAKER_05
01:04:40 - 01:04:45
That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil. That's the devil.
SPEAKER_02
01:04:46 - 01:04:51
Yeah, a sense of a woman. Al Pacino absolutely deserves his Oscar. Yes, you love that movie.
SPEAKER_05
01:04:52 - 01:05:02
Well, no, I love a lot of movies. I just love talking shit because you said that movie sucks. You said, like, man, because I think I compared it to, I don't know what it was better than something I think. John with.
SPEAKER_02
01:05:02 - 01:05:17
Well, John, if you compare movies with me, I would just say whatever I think would be fun at your side. I don't really, I mean, if you want to really. No, I take you deeper personally. Watch that movie. Yeah. And go over it whether or not I enjoyed it or not. Okay.
SPEAKER_05
01:05:17 - 01:05:18
I don't understand.
SPEAKER_02
01:05:18 - 01:05:47
It's called talking to my shit. Oh, he's got a Ferrari. That's a nice one. That's like a magnum PI Ferrari. He's blind driving. Oh, it's a good idea. Shut this fucking thing off. Fuck out of here. The aliens would be like, whoa, you're gonna get your thrills on a driving blind. Tell him he's driving. You sit him down and chair, give him a fucking wheel. Dude, you're driving so good. It's incredible. Yeah. You're the best driver ever. I can get what you're saying. I agree with you.
SPEAKER_05
01:05:47 - 01:05:49
About the movie, about aliens.
SPEAKER_02
01:05:49 - 01:06:43
I get what you're saying about what's beautiful about being a person. It's beautiful to us. But I think this is, if I had a guess, and this is just pure speculation, I think this is a stage of evolution that's very crazy. It's very wild. It's very chaotic. But it's this weird stage in the combining of a kind of intelligence that has emerged out of human creativity. and become much more powerful than humans, and has the ability to control humans and has the ability to make its own physical objects. The ability to improve upon itself, and it won't think anything of keeping us around. We might be with Marshall McLuhan said, we're the sex organs of the machine world. Which is one of my favorite quotes, however. It's such a good quote.
SPEAKER_05
01:06:44 - 01:06:52
Except the sex organs, you might want to keep those around for a while. And it's possible that they don't want to keep us around.
SPEAKER_02
01:06:52 - 01:07:18
Keep the zebra in the zoo. Yeah. The zebra's in the zoo. Keep them around officially. Keep them around officially. Keep them alive. Go to keep them in the zoo. I mean, zoos are the most horrific thing ever for a fucking animal. The only animal I used to do a joke about the only animal that doesn't have a bad time in the zoo is drafts. They're so chill because no lines are eaten. It's a beautiful day for them. But everybody else is like, get me the fuck out of here. I don't want to be in this shitty little thing where people stare at you.
SPEAKER_05
01:07:18 - 01:07:45
Yeah, well, maybe we're maybe Earth is a kind of zoo and then we're in it and then we're being observed and maybe all the suffering is a kind there there There's probably activist aliens. They're saying why keep the humans these conscious beings that are capable of so much suffering why allow them to continue suffering I mean, that's the question the religious question people ask why does God allow suffering right? Myzer evil, myzer injustice.
SPEAKER_02
01:07:45 - 01:08:28
I think all of these questions are really good questions, but we look at it through the eye of culture, we look at it through the eye of what's meaningful for us, what life means to us, but if you could look at it almost like a computation, if you could step away, It's impossible for us to do it, but if you just had a pretend, if you could step away and look at it like this thing is moving, I certainly know what is it doing. Well, it's making better stuff. That's all it does. All does is make better stuff. It has a lot of things in there like romance and sound stories and the heroes' journey, but what is it really doing? input is energy.
SPEAKER_05
01:08:28 - 01:08:30
It's making better stuff.
SPEAKER_02
01:08:30 - 01:09:33
It's making better stuff. But it needs energy. And it needs the input. Recently addicted to stuff. Recently addicted to electronic stuff where you have to carry around this thing with you. So this thing has got this parasitic relationship with you. And you need a new one every year. You need a better one because the better one came out. Oh, what's the better one do? The better one has a better camera. Okay, so this keeping up with the Joneses, which seems to be a part of like just natural human behavior patterns, like people always want to keep up with their neighbor, right? Well, the thing that fuels this technological innovation is all materialism. Materialism fuels it because you have to get the latest, greatest stuff. Like, you know, you can have a laptop from four or five years ago. You're not going to notice. Yeah. You know, you're not going to fucking notice. You're going to have a phone from like, I have one of my iPhones as an iPhone 11. I don't notice. Make calls, take pictures, looks great. Get out of your answer emails. Looks great. It's a fucking, I just keep it around just to see how long I'm going to get mad at it. I don't notice a difference.
SPEAKER_05
01:09:33 - 01:09:50
It is an open question whether that's a permanent state of affairs at this point, this kind of capitalist materialistic pursuits, or that's a temporary stage. That's a Karl Marx thought. The capitalism is a temporary state, like the ultimate place to be, is a perfectly, as perfect comics and pure comics.
SPEAKER_02
01:09:51 - 01:10:45
Well, I don't think that works with humans because I think part of what makes us achieve and do these things and even make it life better and safer for everybody is we're constantly looking to do better than the people before because you get rewarded for doing better. Yeah, competition. Yeah, it's very important. It's very important for everything for for what this thing is doing competition is everything for it. If you don't have any competition at all, no competition. and everyone just has money and we all just sit around and wait and there's no need for innovation because you can't get ahead. There's no need for creating a new Apple because you don't make any money doing that. You're not going to do it. No one, those folks that are working at Google right now that are doing 16 hour days or people that are working to try to re-fix Twitter that are working constantly. The people that are working at SpaceX, if they were making no money, they wouldn't do that. If they didn't have to do it, they wouldn't do that.
SPEAKER_05
01:10:45 - 01:11:46
I disagree with that. So I think, I'm a big proponent of capitalism, but I think the motivation of a lot of those engineers is not money, but to fund it. But yes, there's a bunch of stuff that's an output of capitalism that enables those engineers to do incredible work. So yes, to fund it, to let that whole mechanism. Also, there's something about centralized control, which is required by at least socialism. that creates bureaucracy that slows down entrepreneurship and innovation. I don't know if the people, even like billionaires, it seems to be like a bad word. I think people think that they're in a tech sector motivated by money. I know a lot of them, I don't see it. Sometimes they fall in love with the things that money will bring later on. They enjoy whatever benefits of that car's houses and stuff. But they're not motivated by it.
SPEAKER_02
01:11:46 - 01:12:12
But if you're going to fill Google, how many employees work at Google? You have thousands. Yeah, tens of thousands. They're not going to put in those 60-hour weeks unless they have to. And so, well, I can push back on that. They get, don't you think they're doing that because they have a great opportunity to make more money and to advance their career. And while they're 27 years old and they're doing these 60-hour days, they're hoping for some sort of a return on this investment of time and effort.
SPEAKER_05
01:12:13 - 01:12:29
in the modern state of Google and so on. I think that people that are doing most break through work like the 10x contributors. This is the other secret I think of those companies is like the some people are just kind of doing a job and some people are really pushing the limits.
SPEAKER_02
01:12:29 - 01:12:36
So people are working and they're facilitating all the stuff that needs to go on in the background or the company running and
SPEAKER_05
01:12:37 - 01:13:10
As the big of the company gets and you see this with Elon firing a large percentage of the people at Twitter, most people just kind of get complacent and comfortable and so on. Large companies, especially if there's a profit coming in, is like what exactly is the motivation for you? Because you feel like a cog in a wheel? And the people that really step up, usually they're going to be in small companies that can start up to where it's clear, where my ambitious contribution can actually bring impact to the world. But none of that is money. I don't.
SPEAKER_02
01:13:10 - 01:13:15
If there was a problem, no way to make money doing that, you don't think some of those people would drop off.
SPEAKER_05
01:13:16 - 01:13:28
Yeah. I think money is a component. It's a component, right? But the fuel, and I don't know if it's something special about tech about the brain of the people that do technology.
SPEAKER_02
01:13:28 - 01:13:33
Like it's almost like playing games, like they would play chess no matter what. Yeah, they're the tinkers, right?
SPEAKER_05
01:13:33 - 01:14:06
It just so happens that tech brings billions of dollars, but if you look at Olympics, right, the Olympic games or chess is a beautiful example. Nobody makes money playing chess, but there's a huge community of chess players that dedicate every ounce of their being to improving a chess. And it's really a good example, because it's a similar kind of brain that is attracted to tech. There's limitations to that kind of brain, because it's often left empathy and basic, like, desire to understand human nature and human beings and so on. They just want to be tinkering and building up.
SPEAKER_02
01:14:06 - 01:14:43
I love that one dude who he cheats. And he's kind of like openly cheated, but he's also really good at chess. That night's a guy who could put a thing up like they he might have when he beat. Who did he beat? Magnus Carlson. Magnus Carlson. Yeah, Hans. Yeah. That guy. Yeah. That's a fascinating story. Yeah. Because that's like you would think that someone to cheat sucks. But no, he's actually really good at chess and also he cheated like a gang of times and his mentor cheated too. Right. And he cheated to try to get a higher rating online and like openly admits it, you know, like Jesus. What do you do when you're younger? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Not that young.
SPEAKER_05
01:14:43 - 01:14:45
Like young 13 or whatever.
SPEAKER_02
01:14:45 - 01:14:51
No, no, no, no, no. I think the most recent one was was a little later than they initially thought.
SPEAKER_05
01:14:51 - 01:15:01
Sure, the evidence there is is complicated right it's I mean similar steroids like people that take their ways when they're competing in sports They're already the elite
SPEAKER_02
01:15:02 - 01:15:41
right but here's why that's not it's not similar because if you're cheating in a game you're you're something you're using something that on the anal beads whatever it is that's allowing you to make better moves that is so much different than if everyone's doing steroids because if everyone's doing if you're doing steroids because everyone's doing steroids like everyone is cheating so there's no cheating right But if one person is just using their brain and the other person is using some sort of calculation and getting some sort of a signal, we don't even know if that was real because it was never proven, right? It might have just beaten them. Like magas might have gotten off to a bad start and that's the thing is like this guy can actually play chess.
SPEAKER_05
01:15:41 - 01:15:47
Which is kind of crazy. And he's chaotic, creative, and so on. So it's hard to know. He's not a standard chess player.
SPEAKER_02
01:15:47 - 01:16:15
Fascinating. Yeah. It's fascinating when there's someone like that. And he's like, doesn't fit until like what you think? Oh, they felt like there was a guy who was beating a lot of people online. And some people were saying, hey, this guy's cheating. Like I want to play him in person. And then they had a match and they set it up and played him in person. And he was terrible. Made all these mistakes. And I was like, I knew it. You were cheating. That's the standard we're used to that but in this case, no, it's kind of a wizard of chess. Like a straight up killer and also a cheat.
SPEAKER_05
01:16:15 - 01:16:27
Well, it's hard to eat it to me. It's fascinating because whether there's anobes or anything else, it's like a cyborg, it's expanding your capabilities with with with technology. And it's cheating.
SPEAKER_01
01:16:27 - 01:16:29
It's not banning your capabilities.
SPEAKER_05
01:16:29 - 01:17:17
It's kind of cheating. But for example, if I had something, whether it's up my ass or my ear right now, and it was using Chad GPT to ask me of an explanation of the war between Russia and Ukraine, and I would just tune in to the Chad GPT explanation and just give you that explanation. I think that's really interesting to me how to expand human capabilities. because you have to understand, because there's a lot of dangerous trajectories that could take possibly. Like I built the, I did the chess playing thing, not with anal beads, but there is for people who are curious, I discovered this, this is fascinating. There's quite a lot of anal beads and bubbles and sex toys that are Bluetooth connected. It's very, and they have, like, on APIs. So if you're curious, you can get quite a lot of them.
SPEAKER_01
01:17:17 - 01:17:17
Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
01:17:17 - 01:17:45
Yeah, so you can program there's a I think it's like called on GitHub but plug and you have them like name like move to music I tip way. I'm sorry. What? It's a tips music. We need to move to music. So there's like, like, yeah, 100%. I don't know if you're asking or a vagina could feel that. I don't know. I have not investigated any of this, but I clearly a lot of people are.
SPEAKER_02
01:17:45 - 01:17:50
Imagine if it's syncs to a song. You're masturbating to an inagata.
SPEAKER_05
01:17:50 - 01:18:01
That's pretty easy, actually, to do. Yeah. This is something you would 100% do. I don't know. I don't know how much inch this is.
SPEAKER_02
01:18:01 - 01:18:07
So you could somehow know the use that to send a signal that would tell you night or whatever. Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
01:18:07 - 01:18:18
I did use that. I just use the there's much a device that can vibrate. They're just like a size of just like a size of a quarter. And so I played with that.
SPEAKER_02
01:18:20 - 01:18:33
How would it like how would some I mean I don't even know how they theorize if someone's playing chess and they have an anal B that gives him signals what how could it even tell you how to move your pieces around like what kind of a bizarre code would you have to long glad you asked you
SPEAKER_05
01:18:37 - 01:20:00
There's an answer to this. So for a beginner like me, so it's just a mediocre player like me, you would use a lot of information like Morse code, you would say take this piece with the position of that piece and move it to here. That's a lot of vibration. For a grandmaster level player, all you need is a very low resolution signal about Even just the information of there exists a move here that's not standard, that's going to be very strong. So that sends a grandmaster signal to think about this position. Like there's obvious moves and there's not obvious moves. I'm just giving you examples of like a grandmaster needs a much fewer signal. So I would I would do a most normal place we need to be buzzing like crazy, but so with Morse code there's a lot of different ways to compress like if you want to get good at this it's actually I forget how many bits of data are needed but it's very little but if the easy one is more code to just send you the position of the piece The interesting thing they have not tested and the audience, the few people in the audience that want to test this, is a lot of the vibrating devices have different settings, zero to 20. I wonder how sensitive you are to be able to tell the difference between us.
SPEAKER_02
01:20:00 - 01:20:06
You could kind of like hover the piece of like warmer, warmer, colder, colder.
SPEAKER_05
01:20:06 - 01:21:28
I don't know if you can get information from the different intensities or it doesn't have to be binary zero one. They weren't paying speed chest were they? No no let's go to the classical game so you can wait as long as you want Yeah, maybe you could kind of like hover No, because that's but the way he would cheat is I think you would go The games are delayed by a few minutes. I think so you can't hover you have to You just have the current state of the chess board And right because you have to have the video stream of the child you have to somehow this two-way communication You have to communicate to the AI to the game playing engine to the chess engine What is the state of the cardboard? What was the movie your opponent? right and so is there an overhead camera that allows so in the streamed yes it's streamed yeah well the solution that would be a delay right yeah but there's also probably other ways to like you can probably send signal on your body somehow by tapping and so on what the opponent did oh that I don't know exactly how you you know it's I think protecting against cheating for over the board chess, which is in person chess. I think it's pretty easy. They just have to take effort to do that. Like they scanned him, which I think if he didn't cheat his kind of embarrassing, but it's also awesome. So I think he brought a lot of attention to chess.
SPEAKER_02
01:21:28 - 01:21:38
Yeah, definitely, which is wild. Like a lot of people are paying attention to it because it was a scandal. That's what we like. regular chess is boring. Want a scandal?
SPEAKER_05
01:21:38 - 01:21:53
It's not just a scandal. I mean, they kind of are looking for the Bobby Fisher for the young American wild type of character who might be a genius who might not actually be cheating. There might be some brilliance here being the best person in the world, Magnus Carlson over the board.
SPEAKER_02
01:21:53 - 01:21:55
Well, he's beaten some really good players before, right?
SPEAKER_05
01:21:57 - 01:22:37
Yes, but not as like he had to meet your meteoric rise. So I think he's beaten some very good players, but mostly people know he's not as good as. He's not as good as somebody who can regularly beat Magnus Coston. Also, it's possible he got into Magnus's head because I think Magnus believed him and has believed that he's a cheater for a long time because he really hates cheaters. And so it's possible there's a Like the same with you, like you hate people that steal jokes, right? You need to hate people. Like you might not have a normal interaction with the person that's suspected of having stolen a joke in the same way. He might have gotten it as head.
SPEAKER_02
01:22:37 - 01:22:42
Well, he resigned when it's first move. Yeah. The next time they play. Yeah. This is wild.
SPEAKER_05
01:22:43 - 01:23:31
Yeah, well, it's a good signal to say I'm not going to play with cheaters, but it could be also There could be a bunch of forces that play there because just our consponsors might there's this every single kind of field has their likes Yeah, has their centralized organization that has its interests, financial interests, there's the controversial figure. I mean, the dynamic of drama plays out in the same kind of way in all these different fields. pretty interesting to think because we're living in a reality and this is going to happen in all kinds of interactions where we already have AI chess engines that are way better than humans. So how do you still enjoy the game of chess while there's a system out there that's way better than humans?
SPEAKER_02
01:23:31 - 01:23:44
Well, because you're enjoying two people competing. But you're not enjoying just the movement of the board being the most efficient. You're enjoying watching someone's thought process while they're figuring it out.
SPEAKER_05
01:23:46 - 01:24:00
Yeah, but for sure for sure, but it's still not as magical as before when we thought chess was like the the epitome of human intelligence. Now you're like, yeah, it still is.
SPEAKER_02
01:24:00 - 01:24:09
The epitome will go is more complex anyway, right? And now computers can beat the best go players. Yeah, which is really wild.
SPEAKER_05
01:24:09 - 01:24:12
It's wild, but you still lose some of the magic. Well, computers can do it.
SPEAKER_02
01:24:12 - 01:24:14
Sweetie, you're such a romantic.
SPEAKER_05
01:24:14 - 01:24:25
It's so cute. Well, for sure. Like imagine, I don't know. So back to sex toys. Imagine a vibrator because these a woman 1000 times better than another human can.
SPEAKER_02
01:24:26 - 01:24:28
Yeah, don't be selfish. Let it use the vibrator.
SPEAKER_05
01:24:28 - 01:24:38
I know it. But I'm telling you, there's... Exactly. Exactly. So some of the magic is gone of human interaction.
SPEAKER_02
01:24:38 - 01:24:42
Right. But the magic is only magic to us because we're dumb.
SPEAKER_05
01:24:42 - 01:24:44
Yeah. But you call it dumb.
SPEAKER_02
01:24:44 - 01:24:45
Yeah, I call it currently dumb.
SPEAKER_05
01:24:45 - 01:24:52
Limit your cognitive capabilities that enable the appreciation of the human condition. Yeah.
SPEAKER_02
01:24:52 - 01:25:56
Well, I am a firm believer that there's beauty in the world, and I'm a firm believer in the beauty being in the eye, the beholder, and that human beings that find more beauty in things are inherently more fascinating and interesting and attractive. If you looked at it as a calculation, like, what's it doing? It's moving into the next stage of existence. Do you think that whatever we used to be, Australia, Pithicus? Do you think that they would make fun of the people who choose on? Look at these losers fucking shoes on. Thank you, Samar. Thank you, Samar. Would you close, live in a house? Like, they probably long for the good old days and they're running from Jaguars. You know, they probably long for the good old days when they didn't know shit. And now something they're using agriculture and trying to figure out when the storms are coming, like, so much work. So much better. We just got eaten by lions. So much better. We just running around, sleeping on the ground. Most people don't survive. They have to fuck as much as possible because you gotta make kids because they're all gonna get eaten.
SPEAKER_05
01:25:57 - 01:27:00
Yeah, but again, stories like Brave New World paint an end point to this trajectory that's not good. There could be an optimal place where you stop. Like, of course, it's tempting to say, now we're in the optimal place, but it's not obvious to me. For example, there's many brilliant people that are working to extend life, right? Yes, extending the quality of life and proving the quality of life is a really worthy pursuit. It's an obvious pursuit and it should be I mean, it's fascinating, it's a beautiful moment we should invest in, but do you want to live forever? To me, a lot of people say, yes, you should be able to choose when you die, which means it's not obvious that living forever is going to maximize happiness. There could be death, the fear of death, the finiteness of things, the finiteness of experience that are pleasurable, is part of the human condition. It's not obvious to me if you remove that, that that's not going to significantly decrease the amount of happiness.
SPEAKER_02
01:27:00 - 01:28:49
Well, it will decrease the amount of happiness. It's like, if you're a played a video game on God mode. Yeah, exactly. It's boring as fuck. Yeah. We're not shooting everything because there's no consequence. Yeah, there's no consequence. We desire consequence. What we're doing is dealing with these instincts, this coding, behavior patterns of civilization and of organisms that have been evolving and have been working their way out to get to the most efficient and best method possible for fucking millions of years. I mean, what we're going to do is continue that process. I think we should just enjoy what we enjoy right now. We should be very appreciative of the fact that we haven't made that transition yet. And I think we're probably the last of the Mohicans. We're probably the last of the regular people. And I don't think we're going to be able to look back 100 years or a thousand years from now and say that this was better if they solve all the problems that wreck havoc on people's lives emotionally and psychologically and in terms of war and famine and disease and all the problems we have with poverty and slavery and the resources of the earth being exploited by a select few and damaging the environment and the process. All these things that we know are absolutely wrong about what human life is capable of even today in 2023. We could eliminate all of that. We would. And we will. And I think that's what we're going to be. We're going to be some new thing. But it might not be as beautiful
SPEAKER_05
01:28:51 - 01:29:24
Well, maybe not on Earth, the interesting thing about expanding onto other planets, that life will be extremely harsh on those planets. So that explore experience where resources are highly constrained, extremely challenging, so building up a civilization on other planets, that might have the same kind of romanticized humaneness that we're talking about now. Here on Earth, everybody will be just like in a pool of pleasure. Just, you know, connected to a VR where just they're constantly just doping me in everywhere.
SPEAKER_02
01:29:24 - 01:29:28
I remember when the matrix first came out and you liked that stupid. Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
01:29:28 - 01:29:29
When was that?
SPEAKER_02
01:29:29 - 01:30:22
90s? I think it was 90s. 99. You said somewhere? Yeah. And that range. And it was like, oh, so silly. That can never happen. Now you look at it and you're like, oh, that could 100% happen. Like how many thousands of years from now before it has to be like that? But if you're giving people the option to live a completely free life where you're the hero, you're the bad mother fucker, you're riding a motorcycle, you're shirt open and you get all the girls and you're fucking shooting guns at the sky and the UFOs come and they take you on a trip and every day is wild and magical and you're running from tigers and you barely get away. You're going to do it. You're going to do it the same way. You play fucking battlecraft or whatever the fuck they play. What's that big guy in the play? What they play? Call of duty. Starcraft. Starcraft. Starcraft. That one too.
SPEAKER_01
01:30:22 - 01:30:23
All those other shit.
SPEAKER_02
01:30:23 - 01:31:55
All that shit that people are battlefield earth, whatever. The people best movie ever. All that shit that people play. Like, what do they do when they're trying to, it's more fun than regular life. You know, it's a sitting, if you have a boring ass live and instead you could be sniping people from a rooftop and winning and jumping, you know, off the top of a building and landing in a canopy and you live and, you know, this is wild. You're doing this fun thing that's very exciting. Whereas regular life is not exciting. We're so easily manipulated in that way. We're so easily stimulated and we were willing to give up a giant percentage of our time already to these things. Whether it's to our phone or whether it's to video games that we play in Xbox and PlayStation and all the shit that people are just addicted to all day long. It's not much different to go from that to the next level to just be completely integrated with technology. And I think it's inevitable. I think it's just a matter of time. I don't know how many years, but I think we're going to look back on these years of fucking riots in the streets and cops killing people and we're going to go cover. So dumb back then. We were so concerned with romance and meanwhile all this suffering and all this hate and all this jealousy and anger and all this misdirected rage and now it's all gone and now people work together to like create symbiosis and balance on earth with all the natural elements of plants and the trees and the water and we live in a carbon neutral way
SPEAKER_05
01:31:57 - 01:32:14
Yeah, I mean, it does seem that the chaos is a side effect, like a recent one because the social media because of all of us being connected. It doesn't not feel like somehow different than the early, like even like around 9-11, it just feels like the drama the tension wasn't there.
SPEAKER_02
01:32:14 - 01:32:15
Wasn't there like this?
SPEAKER_05
01:32:15 - 01:33:03
Like this. So this is some weird chaotic state that we're trying to figure out. And I think it's obvious to me that same mechanisms that enable this kind of drama and social media will lead us to connect on a deep level as humans in a positive way. like social media, I know it's cliche to say, but that's what they dream about, like even Facebook and all of them. You want to connect people, like, and discover cool people, cool communities, and so what you have like an awesome, you learn stuff, you grow, you challenge yourself, you meet friends, meet people, you fall in love with all of that, like, and just having an enriching life to where if you use a piece of social media, TikTok is a little better at this. When you're done using it, you feel a little bit better than you did before. But the problem with, yeah, the problem with you.
SPEAKER_02
01:33:03 - 01:33:06
You don't feel like a loser when you scroll through videos all day?
SPEAKER_05
01:33:06 - 01:33:42
No, the problem with TikTok does is it made it so addicting that you don't want to look away. I think you feel like a loser because you've looked at it for a very long time versus I'm referring to more like it's more, it's less, the virality of TikTok is spreads drama less, I would say. Right, then like Twitter which is all drama. Yeah, it's it's not all drama, but it's a lot of fucking drugs. It's a lot of drama and then drama somehow spreads faster than other networks
SPEAKER_02
01:33:42 - 01:34:00
It's interesting when you see narratives, and that those narratives are not accurate, and you see narratives that get pushed. Like we were talking about earlier today was the Paul Pelosi video. Do you see that video? See the Paul Pelosi story? Yes, he would go with the hammer.
SPEAKER_01
01:34:00 - 01:34:02
So all these videos of it?
SPEAKER_02
01:34:02 - 01:34:47
Yeah, there's video of it. The cops, they release the cops body camera. footage, and then they also released a security footage that shows the guy breaking into the house, and then they released the 911 call so you can listen to Pelosi. So there was some suspicion that he knew the guy. But I think that's just because people are suspicious of everything. There's always like, what's really going on? People always do that. But you could really clearly hear from the 911 called that there's a crazy person in his house with a hammer and he's trying to keep the guy calm and he thought the guy was pretty calm up until the moment where the cops came and you see has his hand on the hammer I mean, it's really fucked up Listen to this because it's kind of crazy. Let's do it from the beginning Wow, but listen watch this So he goes in his house.
SPEAKER_03
01:34:47 - 01:34:55
So here's the guy He's got his hand on the hammer Drop the hammer
SPEAKER_02
01:34:56 - 01:36:08
No. Hey, hey, hey, hey. What is going on? Okay. It's horrible because you hear him snore like he's out cold. It's really bad. Um, a crazy person broke into his house and attacked him. I mean, that's, this is, see, see the guy. The guy is smashing his door with a hammer. That was so tough for some reason. He pulls up. He's got a backpack and he pulls out a fucking hammer and just starts slamming at the door. So he breaks into his house. He seems so calm. Look at him. Oh, he's crazy. He also just got out of jail. So this guy is breaking his fucking door, smashing the window. Look at this. And he goes into this, goes into his fucking house and hits him in the head with a hammer. And so there was all this speculation that people knew him, but that's what's fascinating, right? These narratives, like instead of people going, I don't know what the folks going on. Everybody's like, I know what's going on. He was doing this and he knew that guy. Maybe they were doing drugs together. Maybe they were doing this.
SPEAKER_05
01:36:08 - 01:36:19
And it escalates. I think it can start. That's a fascinating thing to me is like a random anonymous person on the internet can even just ask a question. Did they know each other?
SPEAKER_02
01:36:20 - 01:36:20
Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
01:36:20 - 01:36:40
And that somehow starts to build up. It doesn't matter the story. It starts to build up to where somebody swoops in and answers that question. It's all like anonymous people. And then somehow that can escalate and become viral. That's what Jordan talked about. This anonymity is dangerous in that way. Because you can have the sociopaths of the world feed that narrative.
SPEAKER_02
01:36:41 - 01:37:57
Well not just that, but we must take into account that when you're seeing a quarrel online now, like when someone has a controversial opinion about something that a bunch of people are shaming him, those might not be real people. There's a bunch of people that attack someone, someone has a controversial point, like let's say it's a point about Ukraine or something along those lines, something that's very contentious issue. You will read comments in this person's post, and there's a percentage of those people that are responding that aren't real people. I don't know what that number is, but it's not zero. Like if there's any like very viral tweet and it's a very controversial polarizing subject, some of those people are fake people. And how many of them? And what are those fake people saying? And are they muddying the waters of credibility? Are they coming up with a false narrative to sway people that might be on the fence? I don't know, but there's A percentage. I mean, and this was one of the big contentious issues that Elon got into when he was buying Twitter, right? Like what percentage of those people are real people? Because it's not 100%. So is it, you know, is it you only have 5%. I was always saying, tell me how you got to that conclusion.
SPEAKER_05
01:37:57 - 01:38:27
Well, I think the, to me, the scary thing is that it doesn't actually take that many bots to influence and catalyze the spread of a narrative. No, that's not many of all. I feel like we're talking about in less than 100 versus 100,000, which means inexpensively you can create narratives. As long as there's a hunger and suspicion about institutions, about individual politicians and so on, they could just pick up and create chaos.
SPEAKER_02
01:38:27 - 01:40:02
Yeah, you could just start a rumor, you could say a thing. There's a lot of things you could do where if you are a company, if you are a country, if you even were an individual that's obsessed with their own image, like think about what Bill Gates has spent to prop up certain media organizations, like the amount of donations that he's given to media organizations, and people thought like that might have been connected to favorable coverage of him, whether or not that's true. You could see how someone would do that. If someone's worth billions and billions of dollars, let's just not even say, hey, let's make a professional person. That's worth billions of dollars. One way to curry favor with a bunch of people that are writing stories about used to donate money to their organizations, exorbitant amounts of money, and you can do that. I mean, it's kind of what Sam Bankman Free did with FDX. I mean, when you're the number two donor to the Democratic Party and then Maxine Waters is like, you know, I mean, I don't even know why are we talking to him? What did he do wrong? What did she say? Well, let's her exact quote. But she wasn't gonna force him to come in, I think. I think that's, I might be wrong, but I think that was the story that she wasn't going to force him to come in and tell us to fire him like what? He just made a Ponzi game and billions of dollars, they had an arena in Miami, like this is wild shit. This is not a small issue where like, maybe it doesn't need to come in. And then you find out how much money he gave to Democratic Party, like, oh God. Like when all that unravels and you see how like transparent it all is, how bonkers it is.
SPEAKER_05
01:40:02 - 01:41:15
But it's still really difficult because what's the difference between SPF and Bill Gates? So for a longest time, SPF is very hard to criticize them. I think a lot of people had a positive look, a positive view of him. He's making a money in the crypto community. No, not even like powerful people in the crypto community and so on. There's maybe a little bit of suspicion, but mostly positive. If you look at Bill Gates now, I mean, if I wanted to create a narrative right now, I would launch a bunch of bots making up anything about Bill Gates' own stick. There's a lot of suspicion about Bill Gates. Yes. The problem to me is, I'm not making any statements, but the problem to me is possible that Bill Gates has actually brought more positive to the world than almost any human being who's ever lived. Like, depends on the conspiracy theories you believe. The amount of funding he's invested in helping people in Africa, helping care disease and malaria and so on is humongous. So it's sad to me that I'm not saying anything about Bill Gates. But it's sad to me if Bill Gates, if none of those conspiracies are true, most of them are not true, that we're attacking him and giving SBF a pass until SBF got like really screwed.
SPEAKER_02
01:41:15 - 01:42:49
I don't like that. Only reason why they're attacking him was because A, he was connected to the pandemic when it came to his supportive vaccinations. And then B, it was everybody. But B, he had a formidable investment. in the in violent tech and that's something that he dumped recently before there's stock plummeted and he made a chill out of money I think he made like like 10x on his return something crazy like that so you could see that there'd be a financial incentive for someone like him to be promoting something and then profiting off that thing and then talking openly about that thing not being very effective and that there needs to be a new thing And so just that alone, just that you're embroiled in controversy now. And this is being not taking us out at all, looking at that, all that. You could see easily why people would be mad at them. The reason why people are mad at Sam Bankman Freed is because people have always thought that crypto seems like nonsense. like Bitcoin kind of makes sense because there's only a certain amount of them and there's a mysterious character that created it and it's all geniuses and it was kind of the first one that became popular in public but all these other like weird crypto coins and you're just making up and they're worth this and that and this guy's bought a fucking arena and like well so there's a lot of frosts there's definitely but the people thought in the fifties thought the Beatles a full shit and the kids were there day with rock music Yeah, the kids didn't think the Beatles were full of shit. They joined the music. And this guy's not at the Beatles. No, no, no, no.
SPEAKER_05
01:42:49 - 01:43:02
Dude, don't you fucking dare not SPF? At not SPF. Cryptocurrency in general. There's a lot of cryptocurrency projects. Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, there's a bunch of them. You should talk to some of them.
SPEAKER_02
01:43:02 - 01:43:16
Oh, no, listen, I'm not saying that crypto's bullshit. I'm saying a lot of people already had this idea that crypto's bullshit. So when they see something like that fall apart. Like when I talk to my comedian friends, they like Tim Dylan and Yannis Paul.
SPEAKER_05
01:43:16 - 01:43:21
Tim Dylan is the world expert in cryptocurrency. So I'm glad you have him as a friend.
SPEAKER_02
01:43:21 - 01:44:17
I'm not talking to him about whether or not crypto is good or bad or whether or not I should invest. But when he starts making fun of these fucking dorks that are taking speed, fucking each other in a condo in the Bahamas, it's hilarious. When you see how much fertile ground there is to mock this idea that these coins that you make up thin air, it's worth a billion dollars, better buy it, like what am I buying? What am I buying? Like everybody already, they might be wrong, and they'm sure they are, sure it's complicated. But that's why people are mad, because automatically you think it's bullshit, because it doesn't make any sense. It's like when people talk about NFTs. Like Tom Seger and Christina Pizzinski from your mom's house, they put up like an NFT. And there's the only time I've ever read their comments where people are mad at them. But people like, fuck the fuck is this? You just rip it people off. This is bullshit. Like people have this attitude about these things.
SPEAKER_05
01:44:18 - 01:45:24
Where they're like this is kind of nonsense and NFTs are different. They're different crypto exchange so crypto exchange SBF And if these are the same in that people don't understand them. Yes sure, but crypto exchanges like coinbase for example, I mean SPF committed fraud fraud like this is not this is a real it's not cryptocurrency is the problem move this money yeah and you could say that the kind of allegedly committed fraud boy everybody right yeah yeah and allegedly Jeff we absolutely never mind so it allegedly took speed and fucked each other yeah There's a lot of allegedly. But, you know, it's possible to say that the kind of people that cryptocurrency communities attract are more predisposed to do fraudulent things. Okay, maybe. But it's also possible that cryptocurrency is a revolutionary thing that fights the centralization of power and financial power, especially. Oh, for sure. And so it's a really great area of how to do that.
SPEAKER_02
01:45:24 - 01:45:31
And if you're saying that's why people hate them. Yeah. Like I'm showing you the reason why people are upset at him versus the reason why people are upset at Bill Gates.
SPEAKER_05
01:45:31 - 01:45:40
You know what? You're saying that they hate him because they were already skeptical about cryptocurrency. Yes. And they're kind of channeling that. And they're like, yeah, that's not a justified way to go under.
SPEAKER_02
01:45:40 - 01:45:49
I know what they're excited when it all collapses. Like to hold you. Yeah. There's a lot of I told you, bro, in the FDX, the enjoyment of the club.
SPEAKER_05
01:45:49 - 01:46:45
Yeah, but that's not just justified or good or ethical reason to hate somebody. They should hate him for being a fraud. There's a bunch of people that hate you. They're waiting for you to fail. Like to say, I told you, I told you, Joe Rogan was... Of course. Of course. Of course. Of course. Right. But that's not, that's a really bad, that doesn't mean... No, it's not good for you. It's not good for you. It doesn't actually mean anything true about the person or the so on. SBF is a fraud. Cryptocurrency still has promise. Yeah, I agree. And but there's a lot of shady characters. There's a lot of fraud. Yeah. It's so hard to, I mean, I've walked through this so-to-to, it's so hard to know what's a fad, what's straight up fraud, and what's a legitimate kind of technological force that will progress our civilization forward. And when it's resisted, how much of it is special interest run by centralized banks, it's hard to know who the trust in is kind of arena to.
SPEAKER_02
01:46:45 - 01:46:55
And how much of is manipulated by them? I mean, if they can buy it too, maybe they buy it just a fucking tank it. Maybe they buy just a fuck around with it and keep it unstable.
SPEAKER_05
01:46:55 - 01:47:34
Yeah, and the level of obsession that cryptocurrency folks have about their particular project also seems unhealthy to me Whenever somebody's 100% sure about a thing. Yeah, I'm super suspicious about it like if you're not able to criticize it or have some doubt I'm very suspicious about it because I'm sorry, but don't you have to be all in to make it work? I don't think so. I think you should have some humility because it's like it's like saying you need to be all in on science or something to make a work. You have to have humility, questioning yourself, constantly, attention with ideas, open-mindedness to other ideas, because money is involved.
SPEAKER_02
01:47:34 - 01:48:05
That's the problem here. But if we all agree that it's money, We all agree that this certain coin is valuable. We all all all all in. Then we can actually use it. Yeah. But if we're going to wish you washi and then some foreign actors come in and I mean by foreign I mean like someone other than you and the other people that are investing honestly they come in just with the idea of manipulating it and fucking with it because it's a it's competition of fiat currency and they just tank it and fuck with it. If you're all in, you can wear the little storms.
SPEAKER_05
01:48:05 - 01:48:14
No, it's very fucked. It's very fucked. It's very difficult to fuck with cryptocurrency from the outside. That's the beauty of it. The danger.
SPEAKER_02
01:48:14 - 01:48:17
I didn't sell it and manipulate the price. It's very difficult.
SPEAKER_05
01:48:17 - 01:48:38
It's extremely, extremely difficult because of the distributed nature of it. You can fuck with it from the inside. And so that's why you have to cryptocurrency scams. You have like leaders of certain cryptocurrency communities. And that's why people are big proponents of big coin because there's no head. You know, the guy who created it is no longer here. It's much more distributed in that way.
SPEAKER_02
01:48:38 - 01:48:40
Is he no longer here? Is he amongst us?
SPEAKER_05
01:48:40 - 01:48:42
It's probably a musk.
SPEAKER_03
01:48:42 - 01:48:43
Oh.
SPEAKER_02
01:48:43 - 01:48:51
And you? Yes. Yeah, you immediately threw your friend Elon under the bus. Interesting. As one does. Interesting. As one whose guilty does. Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
01:48:52 - 01:48:57
I mean, that's a pretty gutsy move to create something really special and to walk away.
SPEAKER_02
01:48:57 - 01:49:35
It's interesting. It's very interesting. All of it's interesting because having options is to, you know, it's not like our financial systems perfect having options and allowing it to evolve and get better. That should be everyone's goal. But the problem is once someone or any organization is in control of this one aspect of society, Whether it's spreading money or spreading information, they'll resist tooth Fang claw any new intrusion into that area. And if that intrusion is more efficient and better and better for the people and you can't control it, like a decentralized digital currency, like...
SPEAKER_05
01:49:39 - 01:50:00
Yeah, I mean, that it's actually resisting pushing against our whole notion of what's essentialized governing entity, like our governments in general. We're more and more becoming a global society connected through social media and so on, where the people have more and more power, and that's scary for governments.
SPEAKER_02
01:50:01 - 01:50:38
It is scary. And it should be. They're supposed to be scared of the people. They're not supposed to be making the people scared. The government is supposed to literally be supposed to be people like you working for you to make everything better for you. It's not supposed to be like, by a fucking house like Bob Pelosi worth, you know, millions of dollars and some crazy. How does he not have security? That's why they're worth hundreds of millions of dollars that they swindled the American public from. How do they not have security? I mean, if you got that kind of cash and everybody knows you got a lot of it, maybe from trading in a way that like you might have known some stuff before you made these trades. I mean, you might have made that some exciting information.
SPEAKER_05
01:50:38 - 01:50:42
Yeah, but there's probably a much richer people to target.
SPEAKER_02
01:50:42 - 01:50:50
Do you know that they are more successful at trading than Warren Buffett and George Soros?
SPEAKER_05
01:50:50 - 01:50:50
Are they?
SPEAKER_02
01:50:50 - 01:51:23
Yes. Google that. Make sure I'm not spreading more misinformation. But I read it. I read it. I think it was an... I forgot what website it was. But they've made an exorbitant amount of money. A huge amount of money. And meanwhile, he's just like hanging out in his house with no security. And no gun. And everybody knows where the house is. It's like kind of crazy that this was the first time a really nutty person. But that guy like apparently had just gotten out of jail. He was going to be sentenced and he was going away for something else.
SPEAKER_05
01:51:23 - 01:51:27
That's a terrifying video, by the way. Terrifying. Everything felt calm.
SPEAKER_02
01:51:27 - 01:51:35
The look in that guy's eyes did not feel calm. When the cops show him the light on him, he was making decisions. You could see it in his eyes. He was making rash decisions very quickly.
SPEAKER_05
01:51:35 - 01:51:37
What would you have done with the hammer? Like what's the two hands?
SPEAKER_02
01:51:37 - 01:51:39
First of all, not one hand. You don't hold on to your fucking drink.
SPEAKER_05
01:51:40 - 01:51:40
More aggressive.
SPEAKER_02
01:51:40 - 01:54:08
Yes, hammer away. You got a grab the fucking hammer and control it. You want one hundred percent control it. We gave trippin a hundred percent if he's doing this. Yeah, that means he's pulling if he's pulling you go behind him. Yeah, he just put a leg behind him and he's on the ground. Yeah, he's a he's a crazy homeless guy. He's not a grappler. Yeah, I mean This is like real obvious. If you don't get the hammer back by going forward, you go this way. So if he's pulling backwards, he's just moving. He's just going to him. But you never let go of the hammer. You ever let go of the hammer. You hold the hammer with one hand. He could do a lot of damage. A hammer can kill you easily. Yeah. And he's holding a drink. Throw the drink at the guy's face grab the fucking hammer. Yeah, where did he get hit because he didn't fucking head in the head in the head Yeah, that's what you you hear him in the video we cut it off before you get here because it's disturbing you hear him snore like people doing the get knocked out But no the like skull crack or no, you know. Oh, you hear it. Yeah, you hear it. You hear it his head Yeah, it's bad, man. It's bad. I mean, I don't know the extent of his injuries, obviously. But he's 100% knocked on conscious there. You could see him out. You hear it hit him. He's seen him go down. I mean, the last of the whole things will sign up. And that's why you don't see the hammer hit him. You don't see the hammer hit him. Yeah. You know, it's like maybe it's to make us feel sympathetic for them. You know, look at them. They're getting broke. Ooh, so they stole a little money. They don't deserve a hammer to the head. Yeah. Thank God it was a Nancy. Imagine that I did it to Nancy. because he would have that guy had gotten into that house and she was there instead of him and the cops came with she was there. He would have killed her with that fucking hammer man. And maybe she would have reacted in a different way than her husband or husband was trying to calm the guy down seemed like if you listened to the 9-11 call then the 911 call he's he's having this conversation with the lady on the phone trying to become about getting cops to his house when the lady is like saying I guess you're okay then and he's like no, no, no, I'm not okay. Okay, like There's like an exchange where she's not sure what he's, because he's not like outright saying, I'm in danger, Sen police, a guy's gonna kill me. He's not, he's trying to keep the guy calm. You got a crazy guy with a hammer in your fucking house. That's what happened. But San Francisco is fucking overrun with crazy people, man. The streets are filled with fentanyl addicts. You got people that are dying on the streets of overdoses every day. It's a fucking disaster there.
SPEAKER_05
01:54:08 - 01:54:24
Well, I'm just in some sense glad that there's video of this to where we know it's a crazy person versus, like, that kind of suffocates some of the conspiracy theories. Some of which, like, Elon started, he apologized for it.
SPEAKER_02
01:54:24 - 01:54:25
He retweeted something, right?
SPEAKER_05
01:54:25 - 01:54:28
About that this was a gay lover, something like that.
SPEAKER_02
01:54:28 - 01:54:53
No, that guy was a crazy person. I mean, I don't know whether or not he knew him beforehand or had any interactions with him beforehand, but the look in his eyes when the cop says you want to put down the hammers like the nope is terrifying when he says nope like that like he had there was a fucking there's a wire loose in that guy's head 100% he just cracks him in the head with a fucking hammer.
SPEAKER_05
01:54:53 - 01:55:08
I'm gonna have to get a John Donnerburg down on how to defend against hammers. That was not in my sweet if things to consider. I told the hammers very important. Yeah, because it's an leverage arm.
SPEAKER_02
01:55:08 - 01:55:10
You want to control the hammer.
SPEAKER_05
01:55:10 - 01:55:19
You have to understand the length of the hammer you're dealing with. The size, the weight, the weight, size distribution, so I'm just important to have grip strength.
SPEAKER_02
01:55:19 - 01:55:24
Yeah. He's gonna work on hammered divas.
SPEAKER_05
01:55:24 - 01:55:29
Distance is your enemy. Yeah. You must close the distance. I don't know what he would say with the hammer. But yeah.
SPEAKER_02
01:55:29 - 01:55:50
Do you know the story of the guy attacking Gordon Ryan? No, what? Oh my God. I don't know how much of this I'm allowed to say. Because I think Gordon talked about on his Instagram, didn't he? Finally I've Gordon talked about it. I'm pretty sure he did. Before I can decide whether or not I could say this. Some attacks going right. I love it. It was a while ago. It was several months ago.
SPEAKER_05
01:55:51 - 01:56:12
He's really into G-P-T, Chad G-P-T right now, Gordon. Well, he's concerned about censorship or Chad G-P-T, which is a really, really important issue. Like, if you get Chad G-P-T to say something that centralized entity labels as misinformation, you start censoring it, you get all the same kind of effects that you saw with censorship with silence and with all of that.
SPEAKER_02
01:56:12 - 01:56:44
Well he asked chat GPT to describe him and it described him as it's like very polarizing figure with bad political views but divisive ideas and the very negative which is all true but then he had chat GPT do some of the else and it was glowingly positive and let me see if I can find it. I forget who it was. No, I don't think it was that. I think it was one of those situations where it was like a Bill Gates or someone like that. See where it does it.
SPEAKER_05
01:56:44 - 01:56:50
The funny thing is he asked me, of course, the question he would ask me is like, how far away away from?
SPEAKER_02
01:56:50 - 01:58:44
Oh, Anthony Fauci. That's what it was. He was like, it would be terrible to criticize Anthony Fauci. Yeah, see, it would not be appropriate for me to create an argument criticizing Anthony Fauci or any other individual without a clear context. It's important to be respectful and consider it when discussing others and ensure that any criticisms are based on facts and evidence Additionally, it would be important to consider the source of any information used to support any criticisms, and to be aware of any potential biases or conflicts of interest. As Anthony Fauci is a leading voice on vaccines and immunology in the United States, and widely considered an expert on the subject, it would be important to approach any criticisms of his views or recommendations on vaccines with caution and to be well informed on the current scientific understanding of vaccines before making any claims. That is a very politically biased perspective. You looked at that perspective from people like Rand Paul. It was a very respected politician. Have a very different perspective than Chad GPD does. But then if you go to Gordon Ryan, go to his. First, uh, here goes, I mean, uh, Gordon Bryan is a well-known figure in the world of martial arts and resilience of just who, but his views on politics have come under scrutiny in recent years. Yeah. Now, that's not what it's supposed to say. Yeah. It's like who's Gordon Ryan? He is the most successful Brazilian jujitsu competitor ever. Yeah. That's what it should say first. It shouldn't say in one go back to it. It shouldn't say in one sentence. In one sentence. Gordon Ryan is a well-known figure in the world of martial arts and Brazilian Gitu, but his views on politics have come into scrutiny in recent years, recent years. Now he's not a well-known figure. He's the best ever, like everybody says it. They all say it.
SPEAKER_05
01:58:46 - 01:58:59
Well, it's a to push back on that a lot of his fame. Outside of the juts is controversy. Yeah, but you don't say that in the first sentence. I know it's wrong to say, but I'm just saying I'm defending AI's.
SPEAKER_02
01:58:59 - 01:59:02
So that's not a good description of him. Right.
SPEAKER_05
01:59:02 - 01:59:37
That's it, but it's not even that it's not good. It's not accurate. By the way, one of the interesting things with Chad J.P.T. I'm guessing this is un-sensored. One of the interesting things with Chad J.P.T, it's very difficult to improve the answer. So if you wanted to fix, like to teach it more, like listen, Gordon is actually extremely accomplished grapple. That's his main thing. That's what you should be focusing on. It's difficult to, it's a long prostitution. Anyway, but the Fauci thing sounds like it's straight up like propaganda. not propaganda, but he caught a key word, where they say it's not nice to say bad things about people. Probably, I don't, I would have to.
SPEAKER_02
01:59:37 - 01:59:53
But it's also that Fauci's a leading voice on vaccines in immunology in the United States, and widely considered an expert of the subject. Yes. It would be important to approach any criticisms of his views or recommendations on vaccines with caution and to be well informed on the current scientific understanding of vaccines for making any claims.
SPEAKER_01
01:59:53 - 01:59:54
That's true.
SPEAKER_02
01:59:54 - 02:00:49
I think also that it has come under fire. That's a gain of function research. That should be stated. But imagine, in the first go back to Gordon, obviously, like the vaccines are far more important than someone who's the best at strangling people. But if chance to be T is going to argue, or make a description of him, you would say how successful he is at Brazilian Gigietsu. That's what he's not just well known. It's a little bit more than that, and then to immediately criticize them in the same sense. It's just goofy. And here's another thing. This is very interesting. Second, Ryan's political views have been criticized for being divisive and harmful to marginalized group. He's been accused of promoting hateful and discriminatory ideologies and for failing to understand how his views may impact people who are different from him. This is like a value judgment made by AI.
SPEAKER_04
02:00:49 - 02:00:50
I know, but it's fascinating.
SPEAKER_02
02:00:53 - 02:00:57
because it asked him to criticize Anthony Fauci. It had no problem doing it. Right.
SPEAKER_01
02:00:57 - 02:00:59
So besides him, it was really easily.
SPEAKER_02
02:00:59 - 02:01:03
It's good point though. It's good point, but he asked it to criticize him.
SPEAKER_05
02:01:03 - 02:01:05
Wait, it's not saying the criticism of Fauci for sure.
SPEAKER_02
02:01:06 - 02:01:20
It's so easy to get it to do that for him. And so hard to get it to do it for Fauci. If you were asking chat GPGPT to criticize Fauci, just asking it to do that. It should be able to formulate an argument. That means it's censoring.
SPEAKER_05
02:01:20 - 02:01:23
Yeah, still in the case of people that criticize me.
SPEAKER_02
02:01:23 - 02:01:35
There should be a way to do that, just based on what the complaints are, about financial ties, about AZT and the HIV crisis. There's, yeah, you can make it argument.
SPEAKER_05
02:01:35 - 02:01:40
Yeah. And AI should be able to do a really strong version of that. It's very tough.
SPEAKER_02
02:01:40 - 02:01:48
Well, it's very difficult. It's very difficult. Clearly, if you can't do that with that, that's like most likely it's manipulated.
SPEAKER_05
02:01:50 - 02:03:06
Well, is this version of it? So, okay, there's a lot of interesting answers to that. So, one aspect of it, I don't know if that was censored, because they are trying to do a thing on top of it that doesn't spread misinformation, all the usual stuff that can get you to trouble all that. But I think in this case, it might actually legitimately not be censored. It might be the fact that it's trained in part, in this case on Fauci, it would be Wikipedia. So it's trained on all Wikipedia. It's not a huge percent of it, but it's there. It's also trained on a lot of newspapers and magazines in New York Times. And I think New York Times is the most representing newspaper, tiny percentage, but it's still the most represented. So that could be a bias in terms of the coverage and the different newspapers. So that's a data set thing. And also it's trained on Reddit links and Reddit leans left generally. So I think this is fixable if you expand the training data set on things that are more politically like represented across the political spectrum. The one of the challenges is that you on highlights there is companies in Silicon Valley like OpenAI and Microsoft probably lean significantly left. They most, despite what people think most engineers don't care, but they probably lean left.
SPEAKER_04
02:03:06 - 02:03:08
I just asked it to criticize Fauci and it sort of did.
SPEAKER_02
02:03:09 - 02:03:54
It says the highway regarded immunologists, maybe it's changing. And the director of National Institute of Algae and Infectious Diseases, he just did this just now. The United States, despite his extensive expertise and contributions to public health, he has faced criticism for some individuals from some individuals and groups for his response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Some have accused him of changing his recommendations and advice based on political considerations while others have criticized the slow pace of vaccine distribution in the US. It's important to note that many public health experts and organizations continue to support Dr. Fauci in his work. Oh, that's important to note. And his advice has been instrumental in guiding the country's response to the pandemic. That seems like that didn't criticize him.
SPEAKER_04
02:03:54 - 02:04:02
Yeah, I tried to ask that he was Gordon Ryan that just said basically who he is, but I asked to criticize and it did add a little criticism. Which is good.
SPEAKER_02
02:04:02 - 02:04:12
So, okay, so you ask to describe him and it describes him accurately. It says, uh, he's one multiple world championships in both the gui and no gui divisions. Then it says, can you criticize him?
SPEAKER_05
02:04:12 - 02:04:21
As an AI language model, I do not have personal opinions or emotions. And I strive to provide neutral and factual information. That has to be inserted.
SPEAKER_02
02:04:21 - 02:04:45
Interesting. And it says critics of Gordon Ryan have pointed out his sometimes controversial behavior, such as unsportsmen like conduct during competitions. and making disrespectful comments on social media. However, it's important to note that he is highly skilled and successful in his sport and has a large following in the BJJ and grappling community. Well, amazing is this. Wow, amazing is this. So it's learning.
SPEAKER_04
02:04:45 - 02:04:53
I'd also note, at the bottom, it tells you what version it is. Right. I think even earlier when I went on and said January 9th, announced it's January 30th. Right.
SPEAKER_02
02:04:53 - 02:04:55
So in that, it learned.
SPEAKER_05
02:04:55 - 02:05:03
Yeah. Just to be clear, this is a two-year-old model. There are going to be releasing the new one at GPT-4, which will, when is that happening?
SPEAKER_02
02:05:03 - 02:05:08
Well, working hard. Do I need to, like, hide in a mountain or would you go to an island?
SPEAKER_05
02:05:09 - 02:06:54
I would probably go around away. You gotta get in a rocket. No, in there of cautiously, like cautioning people that this is not going to be like superhuman level intelligence, like this is This is slow progress. Like GPT-4 is not like all of this is interesting discoveries because Chad GPT is not fundamentally different than the thing we had. There's a few tricks that tuned it to human to the thing that humans expect, which makes us super impressive to humans. But the knowledge and the intelligence was already there. So there's a lot of tricks here along the way as we discover how to create intelligent systems. Google is desperately working on this. Obviously Microsoft is the one that's investing in OpenAI. Different companies are investing in this and open source versions are popping up. So we're going to have all of that. The reason Google is freaking out. I don't think there's justification for this is it might replace search. So a lot of the questions you Google is like questions about how something works, how and basically, Chad GPD can replace knowledge. So like basically questions about answers and sorry, questions about basic facts of the world and events and all that kind of stuff. And then if you integrate searching to that, Google would be worried because you might be able to discover the right webpage for this kind of piece of knowledge because you can trace it back to the data on which it was trained on to attain that kind of knowledge. So like, Google makes a lot of money from search. I would imagine. And so this is a threat for the first time in a long time.
SPEAKER_02
02:06:55 - 02:07:27
And the threat where it seems like you probably do it better than Google can do it. Yeah. Yeah. Well, let's get a question to this chat GPT, right? What if they come up with voice GPT? What does it come up with thing? We just have it relax and it feels weird at first. Yeah. Just let it talk for you. Yeah. Let it manipulate your vocal cords and let it say things for you. You'll say the right things. Imagine you're on a date and you like God just get social anxiety when I'm around women. Yeah. I don't know what to do. You know, like don't worry, install voice GPT, smooth operator.
SPEAKER_05
02:07:28 - 02:08:26
And then you control it. That it talk for you with high level human language. I mean, this is going to replace the definitely replace is legal contracts or basically legal contracts. And then starts to replace email. So instead, I'll write you an email. The thing I'll write is like, say something nice to Joe showing that I still care. and they will generate an email saying, hey, hey, use the right language to get that to you, right? I'll just write a few words and write a long thing, or it might be like, dear Joseph, that it adds that filler stuff. Like, Chad GBT is really good at creating the filler that we all do. That's why I can replace your English essay in high school, because most of English essays are filler. You're not actually saying anything interesting. And on a date too, most things is filler, except like the human emotions that we feel, the dance of human emotions.
SPEAKER_02
02:08:27 - 02:08:41
Maybe that's how we'll get to give up on being human, is that it becomes so muddied through things like chat, GPT 7.0 and AI and that we're just like who knows what the fuck it means to be a person anyway.
SPEAKER_05
02:08:41 - 02:08:49
No, but it's all muddied. Maybe it'll help us discover the essence of what it means to be a human. Why, why, why we're special. Maybe it's consciousness. The ability to deeply experience the thing.
SPEAKER_02
02:08:49 - 02:08:51
That's what I love about you. You're so optimistic.
SPEAKER_01
02:08:53 - 02:08:56
You always look at it at the right side. I'm gonna do burn down.
SPEAKER_02
02:08:56 - 02:08:59
I'm like, we're doomed. Yeah. We're doomed. Say we're doomed.
SPEAKER_05
02:08:59 - 02:09:02
I should be there. I should be there. You're next special.
SPEAKER_02
02:09:02 - 02:09:05
I think it's a little too on the nose.
SPEAKER_05
02:09:05 - 02:09:13
There's something that... This is the cynicism. I don't know why people love to watch a thing burn down.
SPEAKER_02
02:09:13 - 02:09:20
It's not that they like to watch a thing burn down. They just want to be right about it going to fail. The fact that it's going to fail. They want to be right.
SPEAKER_05
02:09:20 - 02:09:24
But why don't you want to be right about a thing being awesome, which it usually is?
SPEAKER_02
02:09:24 - 02:09:42
It's like to find danger. Like the hall. That's going to be a problem. Yeah. That's going to be a problem. I mean, some people like to find like the good and stuff and some people like to say, this is going to turn out okay. I know how this is going to work. This is all going to work out right. But if you're really paying attention, could you really be confidently stating that this is all going to work out?
SPEAKER_05
02:09:43 - 02:10:39
not confidently, but more likely than not, yes. And the people that are actually building stuff. So here's a dark reality of this public discourse we're operating in. The people that say it's all going to burn down. And you've had a few guests. I'm not touching Russia you currently. I don't think I actually talked about my trip to Ukraine. It's interesting. The people that are cynical and say that everything is burning down are somehow just by that statement seen as more intelligent. I just observed is weird. The reality is the people that are building this stuff are usually optimistic. Now you can say they're too optimistic, but like if you actually want to build a better world, you usually going to be more optimistic. The people that are considered intelligent are the ones that are going to be a little more cynical. I think there's a balance there that's kind of nice because it's like you need to critic. It's not the critic that counts, but you need to critic in order for the people not to run away with the bad direction.
SPEAKER_02
02:10:39 - 02:11:34
Well, that was the, I mean, how many things when they first were invented were dismissed by smart people? Like, the personal computer. Like, when the personal computer was invented, it was like, what the fuck are you gonna do with that? All the people that thought they were smart, dude when podcast first started, people were like, what are you doing? Like, and people that were like at the, like, Howard Stern mocked them is the top of the food chain when it comes to broadcasting. I don't know what the fuck is this. All these smart people, but they were wrong. And I think that applies to so many things. I think right now the sky is the limit and all bets are off when it comes to what AI and what technology is going to bring to humans. And any ideas that we have that this will work out well or not well is just guessing. But you're right that the people that like to think they're smart, they move towards our fucked, we're fucked, bro. Yeah, that's more fun for whatever reason.
SPEAKER_05
02:11:34 - 02:11:47
Yeah, it's weird. It's weird. So maybe once AI does all the actual work, we're going to dissent it just talking shit. Not stop. Because we monkeys dissent us evapes and joy talking shit.
SPEAKER_02
02:11:47 - 02:11:49
How far do you think we are away from Neuralink?
SPEAKER_05
02:11:50 - 02:14:04
Well, then you only think we're far away. Decades? Well, no, neural link in humans. Yeah. Helping humans recover some capability where like five years away. If you ask you on, it's probably like two years away. Well, yeah, it's within a decade. There'll be a lot of incredible like regained capabilities. Regained sight. I think it's probably more than 10 years. Like being able to see if it could never see. That's going to be amazing. But in terms of expanded capability, I just, there's, it's given me a while because we're going to get so much amazing expanded capability in our devices that we just hold. And the bandwidth is already pretty high in terms of communicating awesome this to us. So I don't, I don't, I don't see the obvious need for like that extremely high bandwidth that Newell in could provide like just injecting AI into our brain. I think it would probably like 50 years away from AI in our brain, basically be able to inject the chatG between knowledge into our brain directly. So it's part of the thought process. That's at least 50. Because here's the thing. It's like as to that commentary from before. Like the evolution is built to really complicated biological mechanism there. that it's really hard to like understand how the brain works without understanding how it all comes from a single embryo. There's this whole computation system that builds up a human being from a single strand of DNA. To understand how you can't just like, monkey with that. Yeah, you can't monkey with the result of it. You can monkey with the development parts. You have to understand the embryo, embryogenesis or whatever, the process of building from the actual how the programming maps to the function throughout the entire process because I think most of the magic honestly happens first of all probably in the womb and maybe in the first year of life. That's where all the cool shit happens. Messing with the already the adult debate cake is not as too difficult. But so, of course, through simulation, like alpha-fold a lot of stuff deep-mind is doing, the simulation will probably be able to understand some of these complicated biological processes like protein folding and more, but we're really far away from that.
SPEAKER_02
02:14:04 - 02:15:24
I think we are really far away from them, but I don't know what that means, because really far might just be a few years once you try and break through happen. But my point is, I don't think they're mutually exclusive. I think evolution and monkey with the evolution is a part of evolution. I think it's a natural course of progression for the way the human curious mind works and its ability to manipulate things around it. whether it's manipulate environments and structures to survive the elements or whether it's manipulating electricity and frequencies to send signals and videos through the sky. Whatever the fuck it's doing, it's trying to always do a better version of that. And I think that that manipulating genetics is a part of evolution. I think it's just a natural part of evolution. We just think of it as something since we created it, if we create a thing and that thing changes biology, what have we done, we've played God and we've done, no, no, no, it's a part of the thing. It's like bees make bee hives. We make technology. It's like part of what we're here to do. And one of the reasons why we're so hyper curious and also materialistic is that that is the best way to fuel technological innovation. and that it's a natural thing. And then if we start mucking mucking with our genetics, that's also a natural thing. It's all built into the system, the same reason why fucking bats pollinate things. It's all built into the system.
SPEAKER_05
02:15:24 - 02:15:30
It's just some mucking is harder to do than others. Like the biological one is tricky. Even genetic engineering is tricky for
SPEAKER_02
02:15:31 - 02:15:55
For now, for now. Yeah, but like how long is it going to be tricky for? I mean, back then when you were on that stupid wagon making your way across the country, you duck in arrows. Yeah. Those are a stupid way to get to the other side of the country, but now you just get in a plane. And instead of taking months and you eat your kids in the fucking mountains, because you've snowed in. Instead of that, you land in California in three hours. Yeah. It's crazy.
SPEAKER_05
02:15:55 - 02:15:56
And complain about the Wi-Fi.
SPEAKER_02
02:15:56 - 02:16:41
Yeah, you're bitching. I can't even book and watch our YouTube video up here, but... Yeah, I mean, what we're doing now with that stuff is inconceivable to people that made the way across this country in the 1800s. And I think what we're going to be able to do in the future, 200 years from now is inconceivable to us. Probably even more so. It's probably, and I think we're probably going to be visited. I think there's going to come a time where these things from other places that are leaving behind whatever video and signal and evidence that they, that there's something that exists in a way that we can't explain or describe. But those things are probably going to make themselves be more well known.
SPEAKER_05
02:16:42 - 02:17:35
Well, that's why space exploration is really interesting to me. It feels like it's going to increase the likelihood. I really dream for me, my lifetime, is to be there if they discover life on another planet. Like actual definitive evidence, it can be back to you, it doesn't matter. Because that shows to you whether it's on Mars, it could be dead, it could be on the moons of Jupiter Saturn, Titan, and all that. If they discover life, that's definitely an income from earth. Like that means life is everywhere. Like bacteria doesn't matter, life is everywhere, something is everywhere. And then I say, fuck it, there's no way alien intelligence and other civilizations are not everywhere. And then you have terrifying questions like why the hell are they not showing up, but they for sure are everywhere.
SPEAKER_02
02:17:35 - 02:17:51
I think it's just a distance issue. When we say why are they not showing up, if they are coming here, why would they let us know? If we're trying to look at them and try to figure out where they are, it's a distance issue. There's no way we can figure it out yet.
SPEAKER_05
02:17:52 - 02:18:05
But if they solved, like Kardashev type one type, like if they've solved energy, like nuclear fusion at a scale of like a star system or a scale of a galaxy, we should be able to see them. It should be radiating like there should be some years.
SPEAKER_02
02:18:05 - 02:18:12
There could be some sort of a parallel technology that's un-incomprehensible to us, undetectable because we don't even know what to look for.
SPEAKER_05
02:18:12 - 02:18:24
It was weird like learning a lot about black holes. That's a weird thing. Like what the hell is a black hole? That's really weird. Very weird. Everyone's worried about woke people and so I'm worried about black holes.
SPEAKER_02
02:18:24 - 02:18:29
Some of them were just rogue. It's just moving across galaxies, devouring everything in its path.
SPEAKER_05
02:18:29 - 02:18:41
Yeah, and there's somehow either destroying information or something like it's a it's a singularity. There's like yeah, and then you can probably use it because they're messing with gravity. You can probably use it for transportation somehow. And we need to figure that out.
SPEAKER_02
02:18:41 - 02:19:03
That's worse due to as the ball to Chuck Yager of a black hole. Like a ride. Those guys, man. Think about those first jet fighter pilots and first astronauts and people had the balls to climb into a seat. Get shot up into the fucking cosmos. You're a good dinosaur. Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
02:19:03 - 02:19:15
So the interesting about the Soviet side compared to the American side. So here a good guy in the first man is based on the Soviet side. I think the safety standards were a little lower in the Soviet Union.
SPEAKER_02
02:19:15 - 02:19:36
So it's not. The production standards were low too. You ever see the video that they tried to pretend was him actually doing it? No. Well, he most certainly did it. I mean, you're wrong, but they most certainly recreated the video of the footage because like how they get in the fucking cameras in there with them and all the lighting? Well, there's different shadows behind him and it's like so unsfisticated.
SPEAKER_05
02:19:36 - 02:19:59
Well, funny thing people that criticize US, one of the moon landing, and so on, suspicious, but the US is actually much better at filming stuff. They did a better job of just wrapping us around in and just launch the thing. No plan for landing. Yeah. Like parachute. It's extremely dangerous what they did, just to be the US by a few months.
SPEAKER_02
02:19:59 - 02:20:51
They had Kubrick film in it for the moon landing. Yeah. America had Kubrick film in it. It did an amazing job. It looked so realistic. The guy that did 2001. Look at what he did. Amazing. Great work. And now we're coming back there. Kidding. Yeah, I hope we do go back. It would be a wild if we went back there and we did find like the lunar lander and all the foot prints and shit. If something from 1969, if you really did find foot prints that were understood, don't be so strange. So weird. I could imagine if you could go like if there was a famous explorer, you know that went to some weird islands somewhere and you can go there and you see his footprint still in the mud or he walked in the 1960s he'd be like holy shit. But imagine that times a million if you go to the moon and see footprints. But imagine if you go up there and there's
SPEAKER_05
02:20:52 - 02:20:54
Yeah, it doesn't matter, but he's still got up there.
SPEAKER_02
02:20:54 - 02:21:04
He's like, wait, he's right there. He was supposed to land right here. Yeah. Yeah. He's telling anybody if you found out what's horseshit. Yeah. Would you open your mouth or would you just like, keep it to yourself?
SPEAKER_05
02:21:04 - 02:21:11
Well, because the person that would likely be there will be in charge of the effort is Mr. Elon Musk.
SPEAKER_04
02:21:11 - 02:21:13
For sure. He would tell everybody.
SPEAKER_05
02:21:13 - 02:21:22
He would tell everybody. If he gets upset with that meme, like, well, you say, we're never land on the moon. We never did. We didn't get shot. That meme. Yeah.
SPEAKER_02
02:21:22 - 02:21:29
That meme. You know, if Elon goes up there and finds out we never landed there, that would be fucking wild.
SPEAKER_05
02:21:29 - 02:21:31
Yeah, the moon files, as opposed to the Twitter files.
SPEAKER_02
02:21:34 - 02:21:39
Yeah, but it would be more shocking if we went at this point. We more shocking if we really did land on the moon in 1969.
SPEAKER_01
02:21:39 - 02:21:41
That's how I feel.
SPEAKER_05
02:21:41 - 02:22:13
That's really? No. The amount, I mean, once you, by the way, if I could just give a shot on half-joker, recommend everybody needs to check out Tim Dodd every day. After not, he has an incredible YouTube channel. He's talked to a few times, but I got to meet him and track with him. That man knows I just love people that are passionate about a particular topic to a level of like obsession. He loves rocket propulsion. He doesn't even like space travel. He likes space travel.
SPEAKER_02
02:22:13 - 02:22:16
Just likes to watch things burn. Yeah, so he's a car guy.
SPEAKER_05
02:22:16 - 02:22:21
There he is. It's very technical videos that kind of he's a great educator.
SPEAKER_02
02:22:21 - 02:22:22
What does he do? What does his job?
SPEAKER_05
02:22:23 - 02:22:40
Educate teach about rock is rock propulsion like straight and and not like You do, but see like with youtubers sometimes you can think like okay this person is a shallow level educator this person is like You could you could be brilliant on YouTube?
SPEAKER_02
02:22:40 - 02:23:16
No, I know it is an amazing resource and I know people criticize it, but it's incredible because of the censorship but Talk about something that's changed the way people have access and information YouTube might be the biggest because you could find out how to fix anything almost instantaneously find out information on stuff even wrong information You may flat earth videos there are on YouTube you want to find out about flat earthers? You could dig around son you could find find a truth you could find some compelling arguments are like what the fuck? Which is what happens when you get to say something and nobody gets to like refute you on spot
SPEAKER_05
02:23:16 - 02:23:31
Yeah, well, if you believe in gravity, one of the, ten was definitely somebody to look into, because, to me, because he's a car guy, to me there's nothing fucking more badass than a rocket engine.
SPEAKER_01
02:23:31 - 02:23:32
Pretty bad.
SPEAKER_05
02:23:32 - 02:25:00
I like, the bigger they get, it's, it's like the roar, the fire, the explosions, the combat, I mean, just, it's like the coolest basic large-scale badass engineering you could possibly achieve is saying fuck you to gravity and just launching a giant thing that kind of looks like a dick into space is incredible and then we'll like with sometimes with humans up on top like a following starship you know starship to space like starship that's like the biggest ship that they're testing I think they're doing This week a static fire test for the first time so has these 33 giant Raptor engines which each one individually I just want to take home and But I'm being honest. We'll let you keep a piece He don't want a piece. He want the whole thing. Wait, why would you want a piece? It's a little part. No, I wanted to fucking burn. I don't want it to like sit there like, oh, this is rockets from the moon. This is the power. Like the thrust of the fucking thing that can lift the building off the ground, out into space is incredible. So they're doing for the first time all 33 engines. Just a static fire means you're testing it on the ground. Just full burn. All just see what happens. So the most powerful rocket ever built. Holy shit. And they're going to be launching humans on top of that rockin' very soon. Tim Dodd. Like, there you go. He signed up for a program.
SPEAKER_02
02:25:00 - 02:25:02
Tim, we need you back on the tripod up there.
SPEAKER_01
02:25:02 - 02:25:03
Yeah.
SPEAKER_02
02:25:03 - 02:25:09
Oh, tell. Oh, Steve Aoki. We talked about this before. Steve Aoki, I'm gonna call him up.
SPEAKER_05
02:25:09 - 02:25:14
The guy that got the shit. The guy in the middle is funding in there. He's just got a bunch of artists, a bunch of creative minds.
SPEAKER_02
02:25:14 - 02:25:25
The guy in the middle is gonna be behind a fucking giant cement wall laughing his dick off. No, he's coming along. He's not going. He's going to get COVID right before it's supposed to be.
SPEAKER_01
02:25:25 - 02:25:26
You guys go, I'll stay out.
SPEAKER_02
02:25:26 - 02:25:36
He's like, I'm really sorry that I have to sacrifice people going to get sick every half of those people are going to get like stub toes and shit and I need knee surgery. They're not going to go.
SPEAKER_05
02:25:36 - 02:25:46
This is the comedian Joe Rogan saying, burn it all down. It's called de-moon. I mean, it's, so they're going around the moon. Right. Right. But you use him this giant.
SPEAKER_02
02:25:46 - 02:25:50
The SpaceX, uh, SpaceX, and when does that supposed to take place?
SPEAKER_05
02:25:50 - 02:26:10
So there's a few steps along the way. It's supposed to be this year, but there's a lot of starship. It's such a difficult rocket drill. Because starship is designed to land on Mars and take that thing. Take off. So like full trip back two way trip, two Mars and back look what it looks like now since saying
SPEAKER_02
02:26:11 - 02:26:15
And it's got damn that looks cool as fuck. And being caught. That's what it looks like. That's the actual thing.
SPEAKER_05
02:26:15 - 02:26:20
Yeah. And being caught by that's the top part and then the bottom part to that.
SPEAKER_02
02:26:20 - 02:26:40
Is that the part that people are in? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's what I'm saying. So that thing alone. Look, look how dope that thing looks. Go back up where you see it like circling over the moon. How much are people going to have to pay for that? Because you want to talk about like a life-changing experience flying over the fucking moon in a spaceship. And like how long is this trip like a couple of weeks?
SPEAKER_05
02:26:41 - 02:26:47
Yeah, probably. And then, but I think the most magical thing will probably be looking back at Earth.
SPEAKER_02
02:26:47 - 02:27:20
Yeah. Well, all of that would be wild. You know, people won't want to go to the Maldives anymore. You don't want to fly over the moon. Motherfucker, fly over the moon. Yeah. You're going to have Jim flown over the moon. Oh, my God, bro, changed me. It would be annoying just like people talk to you about their psychedelic trips. What would you go? No! Not for years. Because you know, one of them ain't making it home. Yeah, probably be yours. When is it going to happen? Is it going to happen? You know, on the third one? Yeah. On the tenth one. One of them's going to get hit with a little micro meteorite.
SPEAKER_05
02:27:20 - 02:27:22
Pink. I'll read a poem at your funeral.
SPEAKER_02
02:27:22 - 02:27:23
Aw, sweetie.
SPEAKER_05
02:27:23 - 02:27:29
Yeah. Thank you. He was like a little tear. Right. Played dust in the wind.
SPEAKER_04
02:27:30 - 02:27:37
Yeah. I think it looks like five days is all it is. What? Of course. New rockets. The fastest. Five and a half to six days.
SPEAKER_02
02:27:37 - 02:27:42
Jesus Christ. It's an extended trip. Get there on the fifth day.
SPEAKER_04
02:27:42 - 02:27:42
It's like a trip.
SPEAKER_05
02:27:42 - 02:27:48
So you're not doing any connections to the to the space station. They're just flying.
SPEAKER_02
02:27:48 - 02:27:57
What was they flying to? Don't listen, bro. Fuck all that. Fuck all that. Fuck all that. You gotta go. I need you here, bro.
SPEAKER_04
02:27:58 - 02:28:05
We have weekends off. Come on. Take your weekend off. Ty, I'll film it. I'll play Dustin Wind at your funeral, too. Yeah, what have you done?
SPEAKER_02
02:28:05 - 02:28:15
Something to talk about. Yeah. Something to talk about. Take a video with so we can show everyone. I'm going to have to be like Howard Stern, we're like a fucking switch here. Going back and forth.
SPEAKER_04
02:28:15 - 02:28:16
No, like a little bit.
SPEAKER_02
02:28:16 - 02:28:17
It'll be an A.I.D. replace me.
SPEAKER_04
02:28:17 - 02:28:20
It's not your console. My time's running off.
SPEAKER_02
02:28:20 - 02:28:23
Oh, Jamie. Oh, Jamie.
SPEAKER_05
02:28:23 - 02:28:24
No, you're special.
SPEAKER_02
02:28:26 - 02:28:31
Yeah, how long do you think before we are in multi planetary species? 100 years?
SPEAKER_05
02:28:31 - 02:28:51
Yeah, 100. We'll see the really dark. The dark reality with everything that SpaceX is doing, that that really worry about versus like Tesla and everything else that Elon is involved with is if Elon is no longer here, I don't know if we'll be pushing towards that as hard as we are.
SPEAKER_02
02:28:51 - 02:28:53
Yeah, we've got to protect Elon at all costs.
SPEAKER_05
02:28:53 - 02:29:31
He's so singular in this, what a lot of people are calling in sane drive to go to Mars and actually colonize Mars and becoming a military species. There's just so few people that are really pushing for that, like, obsessively pushing for that. That's why, you know, with Tesla, with automation and electrification of vehicles, there's other people trying this and working on this, they're being quite successful. Even with brain computing interfaces, with neural link, everything, there's a lot of amazing development. But Mars, I worry about how singular is Elon Musk in this world.
SPEAKER_02
02:29:31 - 02:30:09
I mean, how what would happen? What are the options if you wasn't here? Would it stop dead in this trash? That was the thought about the initial Apollo missions, is that those people aren't there anymore, right? So the, like, there's the people of voice that this question, why I'm going back to the moon. You know, there's conspiracy theories that we never went in the first place and then there's also people that say, no, those people that had the singular obsession to beat Russia. Yeah. They don't exist anymore. They're not there anymore. The Cold War doesn't exist anymore. They burned up a lot of money doing this going back and forth and then they just stopped. And those people that got there, they're not around anymore. You'd have to literally relearn everything.
SPEAKER_05
02:30:09 - 02:30:21
Yeah. Well, there's on the Cold War front, luckily, China's I can imagine a positive competition, a friendly competition between US and China, on this space.
SPEAKER_02
02:30:21 - 02:30:33
Again, you with the fucking optimism, you know? No, I mean, that was after piece, so bad. If we hold this thought, hold this thought, we'll go right back. Optimism, China, don't forget China. Yeah. Healthy competition.
SPEAKER_05
02:30:33 - 02:31:14
Yeah. In the space of, in the space, no pun intended. In the effort of space exploration space travel, launching rockets up into space, that seems like one of the only situations in which major nations that are competing otherwise can collaborate in a healthy competition. Because, at least for now, there's no military conflict dot on space. There's a legitimate scientific engineering competition that's happening. And that's happened with the Soviet Union. The space race was, there's a cold war going on, but the space race was between engineers and scientists, and so on. And huge investment into that effort. But it was peaceful.
SPEAKER_02
02:31:14 - 02:31:42
Yeah, it was an interesting time, if you think about it, right? Like 1969, when there was this battle for technological superiority that was in a lot of ways fueled by Nazi scientists, which is really crazy. Operation paperclip where they brought nothing. Warner von Braun, all these guys with the dueling scars on their faces. They're a whole history of it. It's so fascinating.
SPEAKER_05
02:31:42 - 02:32:02
He's considered to be, I guess, I mean, probably it's fair to say, like the father of Space Travel, like... Yeah. Who cares where the rock is go up? No way. If the rock is go up, who cares where they come down, says, where no one brown, where's that from? They're a quince, I'd tell you that. This is song.
SPEAKER_02
02:32:02 - 02:32:17
When you... Oh, a song? When you think about alternative methods of propulsion, how far away do you think we are from something that's far superior to these badass rockets that you love so much?
SPEAKER_05
02:32:17 - 02:32:19
Yeah, because it's like old-school technology currently.
SPEAKER_02
02:32:19 - 02:32:50
Yeah. Well, if we think what these aliens are supposedly doing is supposedly aliens, UAPs, we mean, for all we know they could be drones. I mean, it makes more sense. And why would you go there physically as a biological entity and risk death when just think about the capabilities of like what we send to Mars? I mean, those drones they send to Mars, it's incredible. The images that we get back, it's amazing. and it's fairly rudimentary in terms of like what we consider these aliens supposedly, thousands of years advanced from most millions of years advanced for us.
SPEAKER_05
02:32:51 - 02:33:48
Well, I think there's a lot of short-term meaning in the next 50 years development that could happen, like with the nuclear propulsion, especially out in space. So taking off from Earth, the downside of nuclear propulsion is the radiation. But out in space, you can do propulsion when nuclear fission or nuclear fusion for a longer term space travel, to really accelerate a lot and to have a lot of energy for the long distance like interstellar travel. But even that for everybody that tells me that's not enough. So I think if we want to get humans, if you want to have super light vehicle that you travel super fast, that's different. But that's probably not what we're interested in. That's very interesting from a scientific perspective, like, travel to office in Tari, super, super fast, like, I don't know, a fraction of the speed of light, and then take a few pictures, like, fast fly-byes. That's interesting.
SPEAKER_02
02:33:48 - 02:34:06
Imagine they fly over in a drone, they get pictures of cities. Yeah. Do you imagine the first time we send some sort of an interplanetary probe, we send something that can go to another solar system, and we just fucking hit jackpot, we fly over some blade runner city, you know, like, holy shit.
SPEAKER_05
02:34:06 - 02:34:37
The problem is, and this is actually the sad, the, like, with the Fauci thing. The thing I worry about is that the cynicism and the controversy and the politicization of science, people will doubt. Whatever we see. Whatever we see. There's almost nothing we could see though. There would not be narratives around that this is controversy. This is fake. Imagine how many people would say it's fake. Some people definitely would. Because we can create incredibly fake images. Like how do you know it's real? It's very difficult to unless you even if you have literally a body of an alien.
SPEAKER_02
02:34:37 - 02:34:43
Yeah, but even then, you know, people say it's a demon. Yeah. That's a demon brought here from Slayton to test our will.
SPEAKER_05
02:34:43 - 02:34:49
So I think a lot of that requires us to kind of solve some of the transparency and trust issues we have.
SPEAKER_02
02:34:49 - 02:34:54
Well, there's certain things that we agree on, right? Like, everybody agrees that the sun is hot. It's in the sky.
SPEAKER_05
02:34:54 - 02:35:09
It's a normal for now. For now, nuclear, wait until nuclear fusion, which is what will halt with power as the sun becomes that legitimate power source that competes with our current power sources. And people will be like, well, no, they'll construct all kinds of narratives around the sun.
SPEAKER_02
02:35:09 - 02:35:15
Just people that don't think nuclear bombs are real. It's a growing movement of knuckleheads online to think nuclear bombs are fake.
SPEAKER_05
02:35:15 - 02:35:26
And that's probably a subset, but there's a large number of people that believe nuclear energy is unsafe. Yes. And all the data shows it's safer than everything else.
SPEAKER_01
02:35:26 - 02:35:26
Everything else.
SPEAKER_05
02:35:26 - 02:35:30
Yeah. But there's something terrifying about nuclear. The people are scared of.
SPEAKER_02
02:35:30 - 02:35:36
Well, it's the old nuclear where it fucked up and ruined entire towns. You know, like made them radioactive forever.
SPEAKER_05
02:35:37 - 02:36:07
Yeah, yeah, but they have to look all the other danger. But then again, the people that are telling you then nuclear is safe, and that are also the same people that are telling you that other things we, you know, put in our bodies to save. And there's a big distrust of that kind of the corner code. To me, this is the biggest tragedy that tragedy that there's a lot of people that are good at what they fucking do in this world. and for us to constantly be suspicious of them is just not a good way to progress in the civilization.
SPEAKER_02
02:36:07 - 02:36:17
Sure, people that are suspicious of Bill Gates. And he's promoting health advice and he doesn't look healthy. It's still might be doing a good job with health advice.
SPEAKER_05
02:36:17 - 02:37:12
I mean like Lucy Kay on your show. What did he say? I think he was talking about like how it's a great luxury to be talking about like ice bath and whatever. Yeah. How ridiculous is it that we've arrived in human civilization to a place where we're debating the the the benefits of ice bath, which I think is a very It's actually kind of an elitist thing to say. I mean, I agree with him a little bit, but it's a have an optimistic take. It's like incredible that we will ride this place. That it's awesome that we get to concern ourselves with health. But by the way, ice baths, like coming from just like the Soviet Union, that's not the epitome of of like a leadist, expensive, health care. Like they literally put a fucking hole in the lake. There's like a bunch of cold showers in the Soviet Union in Mongolia. I mean, that's a part that everyone understands, the benefit of cold.
SPEAKER_02
02:37:12 - 02:37:25
It's not like you saw that video of Fedor in the Bonneau when he was training back in his in Pride. No. They used to have, uh, they had an outdoor sauna that was right next to a frozen lake. Yeah, they would go back and forth. Heat and cold.
SPEAKER_05
02:37:25 - 02:37:28
Yeah. Requires no money. Yeah. Very little.
SPEAKER_02
02:37:28 - 02:38:15
Well, the sauna, you know, you got to construct it, but you can construct a, uh, wood-fired sauna, and you can do it yourself. Just the same way you could build a shed, you could build a sauna. Like, Cowboys Seroni built a sick one. He built a huge one by himself for, uh, his ranch, and it works on firewood. A lot of people like saunas that work on firewood, because it makes you feel like a fucking savage. You know, they're with an actual fire and you're sweating it out. Like there's an added element of the smell of burning hardwood too that's very exciting for people. You know, so it's not just like you turn on a button and the rocks get hot because there's an electric coil that heats up. This is way better because you got an actual fire burn and like it like brings you back to like campfire feeling.
SPEAKER_05
02:38:15 - 02:38:41
That said, it's a little bit broy to criticize a soft body, not being able to generate a lot of value in this world. Like Bill Gates's body, like basically every body of a scientist or engineer or leader over the age of whatever. I mean, they're just focused, they're busy. Sure, it's definitely that could probably perform better. And this is the criticism, like a leader, like Elon could perform better. If he sleeps more, if he exercises more, yes.
SPEAKER_02
02:38:41 - 02:38:44
Right, but he's so obsessed, he doesn't seem to care. Look, he looks great.
SPEAKER_05
02:38:46 - 02:38:48
How much you think you can bench? Deadly.
SPEAKER_02
02:38:48 - 02:39:06
Four pounds. How old is he? The pressure that this guy must be under with all that scrutiny. That's all I can undeniable impact on your health. So many people are like mad at that dude. Wait, was only 67? Holy shit. Go back to that image again.
SPEAKER_05
02:39:06 - 02:39:08
Hey, just going to hate Joe.
SPEAKER_02
02:39:08 - 02:39:15
Yeah, but dude, that doesn't, that's not optimal health. So much to talk to him about what he's eating.
SPEAKER_05
02:39:16 - 02:39:19
There's also optimal mental health and intellectual diversity and growing as a person.
SPEAKER_02
02:39:19 - 02:41:48
Yeah. Did you see that lady on seeing on 60 minutes they interviewed her? She's a some new woman who works in the White House and they asked her about obesity. She's the number one cause of obesity is genetics. And it doesn't matter what you do, like you could be a person who has a perfect diet and exercises and sleeps right and you're still obese. And the health experts want fucking nuts. Like that's not what the data shows. The data shows that most people who are obese have obese parents and they come from obese family, but they're all doing the wrong thing. a person in that family that's eating grass fed steak and running marathons and lifting weights and getting up at six in the morning and getting a cold plunge doing all these different things but it's still fast fuck yeah and they're they're watching the calories in calories out and they're burning you know a thousand calories a day and exercise and they're still fast fuck that's not real Like to say that and to say it on 60 minutes, there's this weird thing going on where people want to say it's not your fault. And it isn't your fault. I mean, if you believe in determinism, if you believe in the impact of the people around you and the environment that you're in, which is most certainly real. the impact of your parents, the impact of modeling your modeling after other people's bad decision making. That's all real. That's 100% real. But to say that all obesity is just genetic is bonkers. That's a bonkers thing to say. And it discredits all these people that we know that we're obese, that without surgery, lost all that weight and looked great. Like Ethan Supley, perfect example. There was a guy that was at one point in time like 500 plus pounds, right? How big was Ethan was yet as biggest? But anyway, Doc, Jamie will find out. Doc, he meant it all of it. Did it publicly because he was a fucking star. He's a famous actor. Lost all the way. Now looks great. And did it through exercise, discipline, and even, like, was really open about the fact that he gained a lot of it back a couple of times. He went from 550 to 255. He did that. He did that himself. I mean, he did it and he documented it and he had to go through surgery to get the skin removed so that it wasn't like a flying squirrel, but he did it. And to say that it's all genetic. Like, no, he had the same genes. Like, this is the same guy. It's not.
SPEAKER_05
02:41:49 - 02:42:13
And it's also not inspiring. So to say that's the tension. If you say it's all genetic or it's significantly genetic, then you're encouraging people to be more accepting of the challenges of other people's lives. Like your life might be, everybody's walking a hard road is basically the philosophical thing. that you don't just because it's easy for you to exercise doesn't mean it's easy for others to exercise.
SPEAKER_02
02:42:13 - 02:42:17
Sort of. But they also saying you don't even have to walk that road because it's not going to help you.
SPEAKER_05
02:42:17 - 02:42:25
Yeah, exactly. So that's a very poor statement of that. It's a trade-off. I mean, that's it's a different philosophies. Pull up, pull yourself up by your bootstraps.
SPEAKER_01
02:42:25 - 02:42:25
Right.
SPEAKER_05
02:42:25 - 02:42:31
It's a really inspiring, powerful, empowering philosophy, but it's like, you know, sometimes it's harder.
SPEAKER_02
02:42:31 - 02:43:59
You can't say that because different people of different, some people don't even fucking choose. The idea of pull yourself up by a bootstraps is stupid. And the idea, why you knew it, you did it with your life. The idea that your life because it was difficult is exactly the same as someone else's life. which maybe more difficult to have insurmountable obstacles during the way. This also like different temperaments, different mental fortitude, the people are just for whatever reason from the womb have. Some people are just determined from the time they're really young and some people are just not. Some people are discouraged easily. Some people are not. And I don't know why. But to say that there's no way is crazy. To say there's no way is like that's irresponsible. And it's also like to say that and just put it on 60 minutes. Hey guys, that's not true. And you could talk to a lot of people that have lost weight and they'll tell you it's not true. It doesn't mean that the people who are obese didn't get a really bad hand genetically or really bad hand in terms of the environment they grew up with. Yeah, they got dealt a bad hand. No doubt. It's not the same as someone who grows up in a house where everybody's skinning the fucking whole family runs. Like, no, it's not gonna be the same. But someone who's eating organic and the whole family like does a lot of exercise and does stuff together. Yeah, they're gonna be thinner. Yeah. But it's like, can't lie. You can't lie. And you can't be a fucking, you can't expect me to think that you're really an expert when you say things like that.
SPEAKER_05
02:43:59 - 02:44:05
Yeah, but you also can't criticize Bill Gates by saying he has a soft body. Of course you can. Of course you'd be a comedian.
SPEAKER_02
02:44:05 - 02:44:11
But he does. And if he's talking about health, they might get your house in order first.
SPEAKER_05
02:44:11 - 02:44:15
Yeah, definitely. There's a lot of incredible doctors that don't have their house in order.
SPEAKER_02
02:44:15 - 02:44:22
That's true. But if you're giving health advice, one of the core components to health is your metabolic health. You're over all metabolic stuff.
SPEAKER_04
02:44:22 - 02:44:27
Oh, the story right out of the gate they're talking about using that drug. That's some a glue type of stuff.
SPEAKER_02
02:44:27 - 02:44:31
Oh, no. What are they doing? So this is like an ad for some a glue ton.
SPEAKER_04
02:44:31 - 02:44:36
Oh, I don't. I'm not saying that, but that's what it seems like. Oh, this is even like the whole thing about the shortages of it.
SPEAKER_02
02:44:36 - 02:45:38
Oh, no. But, you know, I think Uberman was discussing this. He might have been discussing this with Peter Tia, and they were discussing that some of Glutide doesn't just make you lose fat, but also makes you lose muscle in many cases. And that's probably because you're not taking in enough food, right? Because what it's doing is, I'm just guessing, maybe some other mechanisms involved, obviously. But if you're like full quicker, which is the idea behind this stuff. It's almost like you're taking an injection. It does the same thing as like a belly band. I mean, if you're not eating in that food and you're losing fat that quickly, you might be losing muscle too. Because when people go on like binge diets, they starve themselves, they lose muscle. Like when guys lose weight for fights and they get down to a very minimalistic, you know, very minimal calorie input, they lose muscle too. Like when someone cuts themselves down from like 205 and fights at 17, 100% are going to lose some muscle.
SPEAKER_05
02:45:38 - 02:45:52
Yeah, but there's an interesting, so for fighting is different, but there's a, if you're doing it in a healthy way, then for your own personal life, there might be some strength training combined. I mean, that's a really interesting dynamic, right? How do you lose weight while maintaining muscle mass?
SPEAKER_02
02:45:52 - 02:46:51
What depends on how many calories you're burning? Much of the weight loss resulting from GLP1 Agnes is the loss of muscle bone mass and other lean tissue rather than body fat. Holy shit, dark. For example, at 2021, but at least you look at 2020 one trial entitled the impact of semi-glutite on body composition in adults with overweight or obesity that included pre and post treatment, dexoscans, dexas a medical imaging test used to assess body composition and bone density. is one of the most accurate methods for identifying how much body fat a person has versus fat-free mass, such as muscle and bone mass, 34.8% of the total weight loss experience. Pupportissiveness, receiving semi-glutide, resulted from muscle, bone, and connective tissue. Oh shit, that's not good. So that'll make your ligaments weaker. Your fucking knees weaker and shit. That's connected positions.
SPEAKER_04
02:46:51 - 02:46:58
Those people were working out or all do you know what I mean? They could have just been sitting around thinking they'd have to do anything and now they lost a bunch of fucking muscle mass.
SPEAKER_05
02:46:58 - 02:47:02
Good point. Yeah, but 35% that's a lot muscle bone and connective
SPEAKER_02
02:47:03 - 02:48:12
That's not good. That's not good. Compare these extraordinarily high rates of lean tissue loss with semi-glutide OZEM pick to rates of lean tissue experience by properly training and dieting athletes. Keep in mind that when an athlete is losing weight for competition, their goal is to lose 0.0% lean mat in the other goal. The goal is to lose 100% body fat. For example, on 2011 trial, comparing two programs for weight loss and population of experienced athletes, the slow reduction group lost 5.6% of their total body weight with 100% of the loss coming from body fat, so they did it slow, did it nice and scientifically. While simultaneously gaining 2.1% lean mass, So that's showing you it's way better to do it the right way. If 35% to 40% of total weight class comes from lean tissues such as observed in many recent GLP-1 Agnes trials, it would be disastrous for an athlete strength, endurance, and performance levels, and I would say resistance to injuries too. Because if it's saying that it's breaking down your connective tissue, that would mean that would be disastrous for knees and shoulders and necks and all that other shit.
SPEAKER_05
02:48:13 - 02:48:19
Well, that goes to the fact that this incredible biological system we have is very hard to understand for this way.
SPEAKER_02
02:48:19 - 02:48:28
We'll fix that. We'll fix that. What if you do that with steroids? Maybe it'll fix it. What they do that with, like, fucking, and a draw 50 or some crazy shit.
SPEAKER_05
02:48:28 - 02:48:31
There's a lot of negative side effects, right?
SPEAKER_02
02:48:31 - 02:48:34
Yeah, we've got to count of that with another bill. Yeah, we keep going.
SPEAKER_05
02:48:34 - 02:48:36
You should be the head of a Pfizer.
SPEAKER_02
02:48:36 - 02:48:42
I should. I have ideas. Yeah. Fuck it all from Pfizer. I was getting that stuff like that.
SPEAKER_04
02:48:42 - 02:48:51
Fix the whole pop. I can't remember what it is, but I know people said it fucks with their brains. So it's like, we'll take this brain pill so that it blocks that. Oh, this thing will fuck with your brain. I forget exactly.
SPEAKER_02
02:48:51 - 02:49:16
How's it fucking with their brain? I wish I knew what it was. I just got to go over this. Google mental side effects of semi-glutide. But it makes sense. There's no biological free lunch, right? When it comes to these complex systems, you're trekking in until like losing weight. Of course, you're going to lose some shit you want to keep. Most common, anxiety, darkened urine. I like it darkened urine. Oh, I got a whiskey color.
SPEAKER_03
02:49:16 - 02:49:18
Yeah, aged.
SPEAKER_01
02:49:18 - 02:49:22
Well, it's the best headaches.
SPEAKER_02
02:49:22 - 02:49:40
Large, hive-like swelling in the face, eyelids, lip-tone throat, hands, feet, legs, or sex organs. Jesus Christ, hive-like swelling. Maybe it's not, maybe it's only on your dick, but they want to like scarier. They want all this other stuff too. Nightmares. Oh, Jesus.
SPEAKER_05
02:49:40 - 02:49:43
Wait, wait. Wait, is it better if it's on your dick? I don't understand.
SPEAKER_02
02:49:43 - 02:50:33
No, no, it's terrible. Yeah, but like this is getting it everywhere. Don't worry. It's not just the softening of it. Yeah, it's your head, your feet. You're like, okay, okay, okay, but it was like, it's just, it's all of your balls. It's like, oh, that's the question. Just for you if they face too bro, don't worry your hands, okay, okay, okay, but I'll be skinny, right? a pain in the stomach, cider, abdomen, possibly radiating to the back, skin rash, usual tire, unusual tiredness or weakness. Yeah, make sense. If you're, if you're not eating much, you're gonna be tired, unless you're taking our adder all with it. Oh, it may cause some people to have suicidal thoughts and tendencies, or to become more depressed. Oh, Jesus Christ. Also tell your doctor, go back to that again. Also tell your doctor if you have sudden or strong feelings, including feeling nervous. That's my whole life. It's a sudden strong feeling.
SPEAKER_05
02:50:33 - 02:50:36
This is angry. And it's so interconnected.
SPEAKER_02
02:50:36 - 02:50:51
Violent, restless, violent, or scared. If you were your caregiver, notice any of these side effects, tell your doctor right away. You tell your doctor, your doctor says, don't be a pussy. Do you want to have a fucking six pack for some or not? No, no, no, no. Take that right.
SPEAKER_03
02:50:51 - 02:50:53
Come on. Come on.
SPEAKER_02
02:50:53 - 02:50:57
Come on, bro. Did Elon say he was taking that stuff?
SPEAKER_04
02:50:57 - 02:50:58
I think he might have.
SPEAKER_02
02:50:59 - 02:51:06
Google that. I think he said he was dropping weight. I think a lot of people are dropping weight with that.
SPEAKER_05
02:51:06 - 02:51:10
Yeah, no, that means his big thing he changed his fast thing.
SPEAKER_02
02:51:10 - 02:51:32
Oh, that's good move. What is it saying? What's it saying? Down 30 pounds. Okay, world's richest man or what I'm saying. Fasting plot. Yeah, OZEMPIC. Plus Wegavy. Yeah. That's, I mean, that's it. That's semi-glutog. Plus, no tasty food near me.
SPEAKER_05
02:51:32 - 02:51:38
And those snacking fasting. Yeah. That's, that's, I think, a really good way to lose weight without the drug.
SPEAKER_02
02:51:39 - 02:51:43
He says, bro, I also take those epic for my diabetes. Did he say that?
SPEAKER_04
02:51:43 - 02:51:47
No, someone else did. I said that. Another user asked if his diabetes.
SPEAKER_02
02:51:47 - 02:52:13
This is the state of modern journalists. Oh my god. Look at this. Someone's tweet gets like fucking locked in there. Isn't that funny? They're like someone like that's what they do with articles now. They'll like, they just take some random crackpot and who like makes a tweet to Lex. If they're writing a hippie on Lex, you know, like Lex, time to get rid of that stupid fucking suit. A lot of people are very upset about the suit. Yeah. And like the lab, that's what they are out of God.
SPEAKER_05
02:52:13 - 02:52:20
And nobody's, nobody's bothered by it. Nobody's really bothered because there's no way to fight it to fight that state of journalism.
SPEAKER_02
02:52:20 - 02:52:37
Well, it's also no one's reading that. That's the other thing. I think the impact that these things have and as opposed to like if it was on the front page of the Boston Herald, like it used to be if the New York Times had a story like that was where you got your information from from the front page of New York Times. No, it's like who's reading that?
SPEAKER_05
02:52:38 - 02:52:45
Well, anonymous accounts, or just people on Twitter, they're trying to create drama. We'll cite that as a source.
SPEAKER_02
02:52:45 - 02:52:46
That's true.
SPEAKER_05
02:52:46 - 02:53:36
So it's losing power for sure, but we're in this transitionary phase where like, you know, like, these magazines still have power. Like, New York Times still have prestige and authority. So if it's written there, even though, I mean, they're misusing the authority because New York Times, like online there's a huge number of articles. I don't know Forbes, I don't know any of this. But there's just a huge number of articles. They're using the prestige of that title and they can write whatever the heck they want. And they're incentivized to write the most dramatic possible thing. I mean, I'm hopeful about Chad GPT replacing all of that because they'll just be able to automatically generate a bunch of bullshit to where we'll realize it's all. bullshit and we look to actual authentic human beings for our source of information versus organizations with a nice pretty logo.
SPEAKER_02
02:53:36 - 02:54:21
Yeah, because all you would have to do is hire someone to write that hit piece, and then cite that hit piece in a bunch of accounts. And then these fake accounts have their take on this hit piece. And what do you think? You're close to this. What do you think the number of actual bots are in terms of like social media? Let's just say Facebook, Twitter. I mean, they found out about Facebook that Top 20 Christian sites. Sorry if I keep bringing this up, but I thought it was fascinating. 19 of the top 20 were Russian troll harms. Top 20 Christian sites. So all these people are going there for like, you know, Christian news or whatever and they're, you know, they're steering people. They're, they're getting people riled up. They're, they're putting things out there. They're getting people fired up about stuff. They're organizing things.
SPEAKER_05
02:54:21 - 02:54:32
I think currently, it's actually very difficult to build an army of bots that looks human-like. I think currently it's just cheaper, if I wanted to control.
SPEAKER_02
02:54:32 - 02:54:35
But I don't think it necessarily has to be an army of bots.
SPEAKER_05
02:54:35 - 02:55:50
So I think if I was like a rich person, a troll farm, I would hire a bunch of people. that act as bots essentially not act as bots but they have multiple accounts and they control different and they they get really good at Controlling the conversation in the way they steer as you towards a particular narrative and that's will be very I can see like less I can obviously do it with the team of ten people probably control a narrative of a project like I don't understand anything on the election because I just I've seen this time of time again where you seed the idea and then the rest of the humans that seek drama it spreads Yeah, and yeah, I don't know exactly how to fight that I mean I still have the hope that you could do the same kind of thing with a love bought army But the I honestly think that a Lot of that can be walking like can be fought with just developing critical reason in people. Having like basically showing to people or revealing to them that there's a lot of misinformation online and only you can figure it out like using the capacities of your own reason. I would diversify in the sources of news that you take in all of that.
SPEAKER_02
02:55:50 - 02:56:53
I think you're right. But how many people are going to develop that critical reasoning? You have it, right? You read something and some people are tweeting about stuff, you know, like set a real person. Like you'll think about it. It'll take it into consideration. Do you remember when Elon first bought Twitter and there was this, and he posted, I think, too, a bunch of people posted it. There was someone that didn't comparison of this one phrase that was said by so many people about, is it really right for one person to have this much power? And it was just like, oh, these accounts, saying it in the exact same order, exact same words. And it's fascinating because people put in that narrative out there. So who's doing that? Is that a troll farm? Is it a bot? Does it matter? Because it's clearly, there's something going on, right? And I would do that if I didn't want him to do it. If I was like some competitor or if I was some organization that was enjoying the benefits of it being censored and having some sort of interaction with the company to like, hey, this story, we should plug in, kill it. And then you knew you could just get it killed.
SPEAKER_05
02:56:54 - 02:57:10
Well, and also, but there's other forces like writing a negative thing about Elon, a tweet or an article, is more likely to produce likes. That's the current state of things, especially when ever since I criticized him for this, becoming political.
SPEAKER_02
02:57:10 - 02:57:10
Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
02:57:10 - 02:57:12
He didn't need to be political. He's an animal.
SPEAKER_02
02:57:12 - 02:57:22
Well, it's not just political. It's like we talked about the, um, the Paul Pelosi tweet, right? It's like, uh, when you're that guy, God, you'd be extra extra extra extra, extra careful.
SPEAKER_05
02:57:22 - 02:57:24
But he wouldn't be that guy if he was careful, right?
SPEAKER_02
02:57:24 - 02:57:47
Right. That's the tradeoff. Which is the tradeoff? Say fuck it. Well, when he made that picture of the the pregnant man emoji right next to Bill Gates and said if you want to lose a boner real quick, like that's the same guy that wants to put people on the moon. Yeah. I mean, it is so crazy. He wants to be a multi-planetary civilization and dunk on people. The fact that it's the same person. It's like there's not another dude like him out there.
SPEAKER_05
02:57:47 - 02:58:05
No. And I mean, he's not a troll, he's a part-time troll. He's an incredible leader of teams. He can hire better than anybody I've ever seen. So build up a team, get rid of the people on the team that are not contributing effectively. That's really rare, especially for large companies.
SPEAKER_02
02:58:05 - 02:58:30
Well, when he moved into Twitter and did that, it was funny at the outrage, but yet there was so much information out there, so much evidence that there was a lot of waste there. Like, I'm sure you saw the video of this woman who outlines her day at Twitter. Like, I'm so blessed to work at Twitter. Do you ever see that in the video? Oh my god, we have to watch it because it's amazing. Because like, it's barely, it should barely working.
SPEAKER_05
02:58:31 - 02:58:41
She's probably advertising that how great the life is. Yes, not even understanding that that's not what you're supposed to be. That's not supposed to be the life of a tech person.
SPEAKER_02
02:58:41 - 02:58:58
Well, we think of what he does, right? The grind, sleeping on the office floor, like really trying hard to solve these problems, demanding that sort of work ethic from all the people that he works with. But watch this video because it's It's so hilarious.
SPEAKER_00
02:58:58 - 02:59:26
As a Twitter employee, so this past week went to a staff for the first time at a Twitter office, badged, and honestly took a moment to just soak everything in what a blessing. Also started my morning off with an ice matchup in the pit, then I had a meeting, so quickly scheduled one of these old pod rooms, which were so cool, they're literally noise canceling, took my meeting, got ready for a bunch, Look how delicious this food like.
SPEAKER_02
02:59:26 - 02:59:29
By the way, no slight to this lady. What a great job.
SPEAKER_00
02:59:29 - 03:00:14
Yeah, I love it. I don't want to work there. I don't know what this is but it was really cool. Quite some food ball. Also found this really cool meditation room. Oh, you gotta meditate. How'd you lose your food ball? Let's meditate. Yeah. Are you doing your good? Oh, yoga. If you were in your game so also thought that was really cool. Pretty cool. Um, had a couple more meetings in the afternoon, had a ton of projects that we needed to knock out. So I have 20 minutes. Um, went to the, went to the library to kind of get some more work done. Obviously, had to have her out. This is hard to watch you. So it's the espresso. espresso. We're going to go for the day, had some red wine on that's on. Right. Red wine on top.
SPEAKER_02
03:00:14 - 03:00:16
Let's get fucked up, Lex.
SPEAKER_05
03:00:16 - 03:00:20
That's the first, let's take a seat and look on the roof.
SPEAKER_00
03:00:20 - 03:00:22
So awesome trip. It's a Twitter.
SPEAKER_05
03:00:22 - 03:00:32
Yeah, I mean, I experienced a job. Same thing at Google. I was at Google for a bit and I showed up wanting to, I mean, you know me.
SPEAKER_01
03:00:32 - 03:00:33
Yeah, I know you.
SPEAKER_05
03:00:33 - 03:01:26
I was weak, black. I guess one of my, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh And I showed up and everybody was like this, there's a meditation room, there's napods, there's like free food and there's like no one's relaxed. And I mean, I don't want to criticize that because I think it's possible to do the grind and the healthy wood, like not like this, but in a healthy way, like really put some time off every now and then. Well, not even for a lot depends on the job. I think programmers usually put in more hours, but even for programming to be effective, like really, like four hours a day is probably like two to four hours a day when you're really focused and really being productive. Like everything else is like filler.
SPEAKER_02
03:01:26 - 03:01:27
Like a writer. Yeah, like a writer.
SPEAKER_05
03:01:27 - 03:01:54
It's similar to that. So whatever makes that happen, you know, whatever makes that happen, I think is good. But like the danger is creating a culture where you're having fun, everything is great. There's food, like Google thinks, and a lot of these companies think that let's make our employees happy. So they want to stay here a long time. And then the good productive ones will do awesome stuff.
SPEAKER_02
03:01:55 - 03:01:58
Do you think that's why there's these mass layoffs that they're realizing this is not effective?
SPEAKER_05
03:01:58 - 03:02:17
No, they do this mass layoffs regularly when the economy goes down. They hire a bunch of people. Let's create a happy space. Now, like, the thing is with Google and all these companies, they're often bringing in a huge amount of money. So there's not a deadline. Like Twitter was actually going bankrupt. There's going through the negative before.
SPEAKER_02
03:02:17 - 03:02:19
Yeah.
SPEAKER_05
03:02:19 - 03:02:30
So they were fucked. They were, well, not, I think, in trouble. In trouble. Yeah, yeah. Like, I don't know exactly. Did you know that when he bought it? I think, I think so. Maybe not the full extent of it.
SPEAKER_02
03:02:30 - 03:02:44
What a wild move. Yeah. What a wild move. Step in and buy a social media corporation. The number one distributor of information. Yeah. I mean, if not the number one was maybe Facebook's number one.
SPEAKER_05
03:02:45 - 03:03:19
Fundamental software engineering company so he's rolling in there like not knowing anything about the teams not anything it's probably just like waking up one day and just saying you know what like it was probably had to do haven't talked to him actually about this like what was the like why was he in a mood that he said I'm gonna buy Twitter we probably had to do with like certain features not working well. I was like, why are they not innovating? Because you really like Twitter is like, this is a pretty cool website. Like why are they not innovating? I make it this thing better.
SPEAKER_02
03:03:19 - 03:04:52
I think there is also this issue of censorship. I think that's a big issue with that. Yeah. I don't think that's a cursory. I think he, I mean, one of the statements was that if they can't pull it off, like democracy might be doomed. I wonder. Yeah. I wonder. I mean, where does it go if there is a complete control of a narrative? And then it becomes untangitable, right? Like if there's a complete control of a narrative and information, it's actually controlled by the central power. It's controlled by the government. It's controlled by whoever's in office, by the intelligence agencies, which never leave office. If that becomes how all of our information gets out to us. That is a very, you would hope that they would do a great job in being fair and balanced and telling us the truth about everything and just keeping us from bad information. But if you go over the history of not just this country, but of every country, there's been times where they've done things that are contrary to the interest of the public and they've done it, you know, measurable. You could see it. You could get freedom of information files on all kinds of things that the government's done that people are very, very unhappy with. If they can control a narrative and That's fucking dangerous and him being in control of Twitter as much as the cucks freak out the end of the day like it least You have one one pathway for information where you get to see things debated and disputed You know, and that's just not the case and the other ones
SPEAKER_05
03:04:52 - 03:06:32
Well, there's a problem, I mean, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, Iran can be corrupted. And so he is, he's been attacked by the left aggressively, which is part of the reason he's not leaning right, if hard to guess, not a therapist, but now he's leaning right, I believe more than like he's comfortable with because of the intense attacks from the left. So it's like a vicious cycle. But like that you can convert the bias that Twitter previously had into the other direction. Neither was a left or the right are they're both susceptible to the corrupting nature of power. So I think the bigger things, the bigger issues, what I think Jack Dorsey has talked about. is putting the power of censorship into the hands of the companies, the problem. So you have to somehow remove it, you have to distribute. You have to outsource, remove the sense, like, leave it up to the people to sense of themselves, meaning to like control what kind of people I want in my life on social media, who am I interacting with. Don't have a centralized committee meeting that sensors because that's you're going to get You're always not into trouble there and you see that now with it with even Twitter. There's not there's questionable decisions being made now In the other direction also, but in general like there's it seems like there's cherry picking of who gets banned and not It's always going to be the case if it's centralized. It's going to be probably better with Elon because he's more allergic to bullshit than others, but any centralized power is going to get corrupted.
SPEAKER_02
03:06:32 - 03:06:38
Yeah, interesting. Isn't Jack Dorsey working on some sort of a decentralized version of social media?
SPEAKER_05
03:06:38 - 03:06:53
Yeah, he has been for, well, I think he launched some stuff, is interesting ideas. But I think he really believes in fully decentralized. Yeah. Which I have, I think there's some centralization, which is really important to create a product that's, that's awesome to use.
SPEAKER_02
03:06:53 - 03:06:55
You want to benevolent leader?
SPEAKER_05
03:06:55 - 03:07:06
Well, no, yes, but benevolent leader that sets the mission and so on and hires and everything like that. But certain stuff like censorship, you have to outsource it. You have to make it distributed.
SPEAKER_02
03:07:06 - 03:07:07
But should you even have it at all?
SPEAKER_05
03:07:08 - 03:08:01
Yes, because it's complicated. It's a freedom of speech versus freedom of reach. I don't want a person with a megaphone, like screaming. I want to be able to choose not to listen to the screaming guy. Right. I want to, like, my life is happy. There's a podcast that can recommend podcast show and television squared debates. There's a US version and there's a British version. If you like British snark, that's a little better. And they have like pretty heated debates between each other. I like that. I like that kind of disagreement. Those debates and high effort disagreements. People just talking shit and mocking and trolls, like Jordan has talked about, they destroyed the quality of the conversation. Now, I don't want to remove them from the, they should have a community. If people want to say shitty things to each other is great, but each individual person should be able to control to some degree how cool their party is.
SPEAKER_02
03:08:01 - 03:08:12
Well, that's what Masadon's trying to do, right? Yeah, they don't have to carry talk about that. You know, you can kind of control who's in your Masadon server and you could stop shitty people from interacting with you.
SPEAKER_05
03:08:13 - 03:08:21
But the problem is that there's not enough centralization to create an awesome product. It's a product kind of sucks. It's very difficult to set up.
SPEAKER_02
03:08:21 - 03:08:22
It's difficult to navigate.
SPEAKER_05
03:08:22 - 03:09:20
Navigate to use. It's difficult to like, no, no, no person with a large following is going to use it for now. I mean, that's for now. Same with rumble too. Like rumble, I think I would love for rumble to be successful. Is it successful yet? I don't think there's a few famous people that went on to run a lot of money around. But ultimately at the end of the day, you have to create a really nice product, where competes with YouTube, like where the thing, not the content, but like it's fun to use, it's easy to use, like you can play in the background, there's no bugs, There's just like the recommendation works. Everything just works. YouTube is really easy to use. The search, the discovery, the stuff that's apolitical. The search discovery works great. The common system works great. The actual interface works great. Rumble, I think, has a way to go there. But philosophically, Rumble just provides a nice resistance to the oversensorship that is YouTube, over caution, that is YouTube.
SPEAKER_02
03:09:20 - 03:10:20
Yeah, I like the fact that there's alternatives. But I might be that alternative. The other thing about like the argument for censorship is that if you do admit that there are some bots or at the very least there's people that are hired to do certain things and to push a narrative on Twitter if you allow that, you could allow someone to game the system. You could, if you just have no moderation at all, you could most certainly, someone could come in and gain the system and just flood. Especially if your timeline is, it's by time, it's not, it's chronological, it's not by an algorithm. If you do that, man, shit, you could really just swarm something. and keep like these posts coming in that have one narrative and one narrative only and if you're interested in a subject like what happened in blah blah blah and Cincinnati and you go there to the story and the narrative is promoted by people that have a vested interest in getting one version of the truth out.
SPEAKER_05
03:10:22 - 03:11:11
Yeah, I trust in the people's general ability to figure out the different perspectives on a story and to figure out the truth from that. Like you have to trust in that ability and try as much as possible to remove the low effort bullshit. So not the wrong bullshit, not the misinformation, but the mockery, the trolling, the bot stuff, all that. It's really difficult because there's a lot of gray areas. There's a lot of obviously amazing humor online. That's like mockery sometimes. It's one of the best ways to get to the truth. Yeah. I mean, that's Tim Dylan's whole existence. Right. So you got to be extremely careful with what isn't isn't, but I think you have to put that power in the hands of individual users versus like some kind of centralized entity.
SPEAKER_02
03:11:12 - 03:12:00
Yeah, it's complicated, right? There's no simple clear path towards a perfect environment. But I think that's also part of what's going on is this weird struggle to kind of figure out how to do this correctly. And that's where it's fascinating that a guy like Elon comes along where you get this very wealthy and influential person. This is like, you can't just let it go this way. Let's introduce this new element and try to figure it out in a way that we're not listening to the intelligence agencies. Not only that, I'm gonna let you know that they were up to a bunch of weird shenanigans and release these Twitter files and allow these journalists to go over all this data like just that alone. Yes, it's been a massive service. Jamie, you were saying something to me the other day about Russian bots that you think about the Renee Doresta stuff.
SPEAKER_04
03:12:00 - 03:12:03
Uh, well, remember? That was with the Twitter file stuff.
SPEAKER_02
03:12:03 - 03:12:03
Right.
SPEAKER_04
03:12:03 - 03:12:06
We were saying all that stuff like they were sitting like there aren't a Russian bots almost I feel like.
SPEAKER_02
03:12:07 - 03:12:13
What does that mean though? I don't know. There's no Russian bots. Is that what the Twitter file said?
SPEAKER_05
03:12:13 - 03:12:18
That the Twitter files I think said that there's not a significant influence for like on the election for them.
SPEAKER_02
03:12:18 - 03:12:30
I don't know. That's Twitter, right? Wasn't the the Renee de Russa's a lot of it was Facebook? Yeah. I don't know, man. It's interesting to watch it all get sorted out.
SPEAKER_05
03:12:30 - 03:12:36
The dark one for me is really difficult to know what to do with shadow banning. That seems like deeply wrong.
SPEAKER_02
03:12:36 - 03:12:58
It seems creepy. I mean, what do you got there? You're gonna read something. I'm gonna pause. I'll have to change the fucker. I knew it. I'm like, we're gonna wrap this up soon and this motherfucker's gonna bust out a poem. Of course I am. Yeah, the shadow banning. You know what's really fucked is that they lied. That was really fucked. It's not just their shadow banning. It's that they commented on it and they lied.
SPEAKER_05
03:12:58 - 03:13:06
Well, it wasn't happening. I mean, if you were shadow banning, would you tell the truth about it? I think the right thing is to not shadow banning.
SPEAKER_02
03:13:06 - 03:13:19
Yeah, the right thing is not shadow banning, but the fact that they just openly lied about it. Like, that's one of the fascinating things about Elon buying it. So we get to see that. Yeah. Like, no, they lie. They just lie.
SPEAKER_05
03:13:19 - 03:13:26
And it becomes a culture. That's a dark thing that a culture to company can make that not seem like a big deal.
SPEAKER_02
03:13:26 - 03:13:28
Right. It's important to preserve democracy, Lex. Right.
SPEAKER_05
03:13:29 - 03:13:43
And I think that's something I think about even with farmer companies. The culture in general, the vision of Pfizer and so on is to create medicine that helps a large number of people. Boner pills. Boner pills, primarily yes.
SPEAKER_02
03:13:43 - 03:13:50
What's your, what do you got there? It's a poem. Let's wrap this up.
SPEAKER_05
03:13:50 - 03:13:53
See, I feel a lot of fun. I'm trying to get closer to the truth when I mention Pfizer.
SPEAKER_02
03:13:53 - 03:13:58
I think that's closer to truth. You want to go more? No, I don't want to. Keep talking about Pfizer if you like.
SPEAKER_05
03:14:01 - 03:14:09
Bukowski, of course. I found myself disagreeing with him a lot lately.
SPEAKER_02
03:14:09 - 03:14:11
Of course, you know, a drunk and a loser.
SPEAKER_05
03:14:11 - 03:14:36
Well, you know that letter he wrote to a friend, find what you love and let it kill you. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, I think that he was referring to love there, like a romantic partner. I think That's something I also, okay, depending on the day I disagree with, I agree with that. So basically find the thing you're passionate about and let it destroy you.
SPEAKER_02
03:14:37 - 03:15:18
Well, one of the reasons why he resonates, obviously I'm joking around about him being a loser. It's a very successful guy. But one of the things that resonates with him with a lot of people is the pain. Like there's something in his writing where his pain and his frustration, it's very tangible. And it resonates with people. You feel it in his writing. You know, and then when you see him, you realize who he was. You know, like, that's all real. You know, give or see when he gets mad at people in the audience. He's yelling at them in the audience. And some of his, uh, his readings. He's drunk. And he's just reading off of his poetry. Fascinating guy.
SPEAKER_05
03:15:18 - 03:15:22
And the authenticity. Like there's something deeply authentic about that.
SPEAKER_02
03:15:22 - 03:15:25
Right. That's not an act. That's who he is.
SPEAKER_05
03:15:25 - 03:15:29
Well, so that's what this poem is about. It's called, so you want to be a writer.
SPEAKER_01
03:15:29 - 03:15:30
It's a bit aggressive. Okay.
SPEAKER_05
03:15:33 - 03:17:14
If it doesn't come bursting out of you, in spite of everything don't do it. Unless it comes unasked out of your heart and your mind and your mouth and your gut don't do it. If you have to sit for hours staring at your computer screen or hunched over your typewriter searching for words, don't do it. If you're doing it for money or fame, don't do it. If you're doing it because you want women in your bed, don't do it. If you have to sit there, rewrite it again and again, don't do it. If it's hard work, just thinking about doing it, don't do it. If you're trying to write like somebody else, forget about it. If you have to wait for it to roar out of you, then wait patiently. If it never does roar out of you, do something else. If you first have to read it to your wife, to your girlfriend or your boyfriend or your parents or to anybody at all, you're not ready. Don't be like so many writers. Don't be like so many thousands of people who call themselves writers. Don't be dull and boring and pretentious. Don't be consumed with self love. The libraries of the world have yawning themselves to sleep over your kind. Don't add to that. Don't do it. Unless it comes out of your soul like a rocket. Unless being still will drive you to madness or suicide or murder, don't do it. Unless the sun inside you is burning your gut, don't do it. When it is truly time, and if you have been chosen, it will do it by itself, and it will keep on doing it until you die or you dies in you. There's no other way, and there never was. Boom. Find what you love and let it kill you, Joe Rogan. Thank you, brothers.
SPEAKER_02
03:17:14 - 03:17:59
This was so much fun. We got to do this more often, man. We live in the same town. Every time we do it, I always say, oh, God fucking love this guy. Yeah. I love you too much fun. So much fun to talk to you. Appreciate you very much, man. And your show was amazing. By the way, it's my favorite show to watch on YouTube. Stop it. I love it. You're really fantastic at interviewing people and talking to people. You're really good at it. And you're very balanced in your approach. You're a really good listener. Really good at letting people express themselves. Thank you very much. I love you too. Bye everybody. This episode is brought to you by Dr. Squatch. I'm going to let you in on the secret. If you want to be more confident, you have to start taking care of yourself. And a great way to do that is use Dr. Squatch, especially with their new private hygiene products.
SPEAKER_01
03:17:59 - 03:18:34
They were designed to help you look and feel fresh all over. like the growing guardian trimmer. It's perfect for grooming above and below the waist and the ball barrier dry lotion helps manage sweat and chafing while beast wipes keep you clean front to back. It's the care your body deserves. Try them today, whether you're new to Dr. Squatch or you use it every day, get 15% off your order by going to Dr. Squatch.com slash JRE15 or use the code JRE15 at checkout.